First Postprostatectomy Ultrasensitive Prostate-specific Antigen Predicts Survival in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer Pathology

被引:7
作者
Kang, Jung Julie [1 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [2 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
King, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, 200 UCLA Med Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; MEN; PSA; PROGRESSION; LEVEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2018.07.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen (uPSA) has untapped potential for optimizing management following radical prostatectomy (RP) in terms of facilitating early salvage, minimizing overtreatment, and identifying those at risk of occult systemic disease. Objective: To test first postoperative uPSA for prediction of outcome in patients with adverse pathology after RP. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with extraprostatic extension and/or a positive margin who did not receive immediate adjuvant therapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: First uPSA was measured at 3 mo after RP. The study endpoints were biochemical relapse (BCR), defined as PSA >= 0.2 ng/ml, bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), overall survival (OS), and salvage radiation therapy (SRT) success. Outcome results were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis (MVA). Results and limitations: The cohort consisted of 269 RP patients from 1991-2015 with median follow-up of 77 mo. Sensitivity analysis identified first postoperative uPSA of >= 0.03 ng/ml as the optimal threshold for predicting BCR. First postoperative uPSA >= 0.03 versus <0.03 ng/ml was associated with worse 5-yr BCR (86%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 71-93% vs 39%, 95% CI 25-51%; p < 0.00001), 10-yr BMFS (75%, 95% CI 62-92% vs 95%, 95% CI 88-100%; p = 0.0001), 10-yr PCSS (84%, 95% CI 73-96% vs 100%, 95% CI 100-100%; p = 0.005), and 10-yr OS (81%, 95% CI 70-93% vs 98%, 95% CI 94-100%; p = 0.009). On MVA, first postoperative uPSA >= 0.03 ng/ml was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 9.4, 95% CI 5.8-15.4; p < 0.00001) and the only predictor for BMFS (HR 9.7, 95% CI 2.1-44.6; p = 0.0034), PCSS (HR 13.5, 95% CI 1.7-107.9; p = 0.014), and OS (HR 5.0, 95% CI 1.4-18.3; p = 0.014). Following SRT, first postoperative uPSA >= 0.03 ng/ml independently predicted worse BMFS (HR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-26.9; p = 0.021), PCSS (HR 6.9, 95% CI 0.9-55.8; p = 0.07), and OS (4.5, 95% CI 1.0-20.1; p = 0.057). Limitations include the retrospective design and potential selection bias. Conclusions: First postoperative uPSA >= 0.03 ng/ml independently predicts BCR, BMFS, PCSS, and OS better than traditional risk factors. SRT alone may be insufficient for patients with high-risk disease when first postoperative uPSA is >= 0.03 ng/ml. Patient summary: When the first postprostatectomy ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen level is >= 0.03 ng/ml, patients are at higher risk of recurrent and occult prostate cancer. They should be considered for early salvage radiotherapy, possibly with hormone therapy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 385
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Arai Y, 1998, Int J Urol, V5, P550, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1998.tb00411.x
[2]   Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy:: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911) [J].
Bolla, M ;
van Poppel, H ;
Collette, L ;
van Cangh, P ;
Vekemans, K ;
Da Pozzo, L ;
de Reijke, TM ;
Verbaeys, A ;
Bosset, JF ;
van Velthoven, R ;
Maréchal, JM ;
Scalliet, P ;
Haustermans, K ;
Piérart, M .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9485) :572-578
[3]   Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: The American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes [J].
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Aus, Gunnar ;
Burnett, Arthur L. ;
Canby-Hagino, Edith D. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Dmochowski, Roger R. ;
Eton, David T. ;
Forman, Jeffrey D. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Higano, Celestia S. ;
Kraus, Stephen R. ;
Moul, Judd W. ;
Tangen, Catherine ;
Thrasher, J. Brantley ;
Thompson, Ian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (02) :540-545
[4]   Prognostic Implications of an Undetectable Ultrasensitive Prostate-Specific Antigen Level after Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Eisenberg, Michael L. ;
Davies, Benjamin J. ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (04) :622-629
[5]   Early detection of recurrent prostate cancer with an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent prostate-specific antigen assay [J].
Ellis, WJ ;
Vessella, RL ;
Noteboom, JL ;
Lange, PH ;
Wolfert, RL ;
Rittenhouse, HG .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (04) :573-579
[6]   VARIABLE HISTOLOGY OF ANASTOMOTIC BIOPSIES WITH DETECTABLE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
FOWLER, JE ;
BROOKS, J ;
PANDEY, P ;
SEAVER, LE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :1011-1014
[7]   Immunophenotypic characterization of 225 prostate adenocarcinomas with intermediate or high Gleason scores [J].
Goldstein, NS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 117 (03) :471-477
[8]  
GRAVES HCB, 1992, CLIN CHEM, V38, P735
[9]   Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy - The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Pound, CR ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :555-+
[10]   Postoperative early ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen identifies patients at risk for biochemical recurrence in margin positive prostate cancers: a single-center study [J].
Hatano, Koji ;
Okusa, Takuya ;
Ishizuya, Yu ;
Nakai, Yasutomo ;
Nakayama, Masashi ;
Kakimoto, Ken-ichi ;
Nishimura, Kazuo .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 47 (01) :74-79