Time of Evaluation of Pain Catastrophizing after Surgery for Upper Extremity Motor Disorders

被引:0
作者
Hirata, Junya [1 ]
Inoue, Keiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Kawasaki Univ Med Welf, Fac Rehabil, 288 Matsushima, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010193, Japan
关键词
Upper extremity motor disease; Pain catastrophizing; Pain intensity; Hand20; QUESTIONNAIRE; DISABILITY; FEAR; INTENSITY; SHOULDER; ARM;
D O I
10.1142/S2424835521500065
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The evaluation of pain catastrophizing, which is a negative emotion associated with pain, is useful for predicting pain after surgery and is also associated with upper extremity disability. Therefore, it is important to evaluate pain catastrophizing after surgery for upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. This study examined the appropriate time to evaluate pain catastrophizing after surgery for upper extremity motor disorders. Methods: A total of 32 patients underwent surgery. Pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale: PCS) and pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale: NRS) were measured at the start of rehabilitation and 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively. The subjective ability of the upper extremity was measured 8 weeks postoperatively using the Hand20 questionnaire. The variation in the postoperative PCS and NRS were investigated. Results: The PCS and NRS values were significantly lower 2 weeks postoperatively than at the time rehabilitation started. Pain catastrophizing was a significant predictor of pain, with the greatest degree of prediction at 2 weeks. Pain catastrophizing was also a significant predictor of the Hand20 result at 8 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions: Our data shows that pain catastrophizing should be evaluated 2 weeks postoperatively for the prediction of continuing pain.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, and acute pain perception: Relative prediction and timing of assessment [J].
Hirsh, Adam T. ;
George, Steven Z. ;
Bialosky, Joel E. ;
Robinson, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (09) :806-812
[12]  
Hudak PL, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P602, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-L
[14]   WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF LEVELS NEEDED IN PAIN INTENSITY MEASUREMENT [J].
JENSEN, MP ;
TURNER, JA ;
ROMANO, JM .
PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) :387-392
[15]   Osteoarthritis in Europe: impact on health status, work productivity and use of pharmacotherapies in five European countries [J].
Kingsbury, Sarah R. ;
Gross, Hillary J. ;
Isherwood, Gina ;
Conaghan, Philip G. .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (05) :937-947
[16]   Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture [J].
MacDermid, JC ;
Richards, RS ;
Donner, A ;
Bellamy, N ;
Roth, JH .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (02) :330-340
[17]   Burden of disability due to musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders [J].
March, Lyn ;
Smith, Emma U. R. ;
Hoy, Damian G. ;
Cross, Marita J. ;
Sanchez-Riera, Lidia ;
Blyth, Fiona ;
Buchbinder, Rachelle ;
Vos, Theo ;
Woolf, Anthony D. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) :353-366
[18]  
Matsuoka H., 2007, Jpn J Psychosom Med, V47, P95
[19]   Pain [J].
Melzack, Ronald ;
Katz, Joel .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (01) :1-15
[20]   Fear of movement (kinesiophobia), pain, and psychopathology in patients with sickle cell disease [J].
Pells, Jennifer ;
Edwards, Christopher L. ;
McDougald, Camela S. ;
Wood, Mary ;
Barksdale, Crystal ;
Jonassaint, Jude ;
Leach-Beale, Brittani ;
Byrd, Goldie ;
Mathis, Markece ;
Harrison, Myleme O. ;
Feliu, Miriam ;
Edwards, Lekisha Y. ;
Whitfield, Keith E. ;
Rogers, Lesco .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (08) :707-713