Validation of the Brazilian version of the patient-determined disease steps scale in persons with multiple sclerosis

被引:11
作者
de David, Ana C. [1 ]
Sasaki, Jeffer E. [2 ]
Ramari, Cintia [1 ]
Tauil, Carlos B. [3 ]
Moraes, Andrea G. [1 ]
Martins, Flavia [4 ]
von Glehn, Felipe [5 ]
Motl, Robert W. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Fac Phys Educ, Lab Human Mot Anal, Via L4 Norte Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Triangulo Mineiro, Dept Sport Sci, Uberaba, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Dept Med Sci, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[4] Brasilia Dist Hosp, Dept Neurol, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[5] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Neuroimmunol, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Phys Therapy, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
Disability; Multiple sclerosis; PDDS scale; Brazilian version; SITTING TIME; VALIDITY; IMPAIRMENT; IMPACT; WALK;
D O I
10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.022
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study translated and adapted the Brazilian version of the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale and tested its validity and reproducibility in Brazilian persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: The PDDS underwent translation and back-translation procedures for producing a Brazilian Portuguese version of the PDDS (PDDS/BR). Sixty-three patients with MS (48 females) completed the PDDS/BR and underwent a neurological examination for generation of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. Participants further performed the following tests: Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), Timed Up and Go (TUG), sixminute walk test (6MWT), Nine Hole Peg (9HPT), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Construct validity of PDDS/BR scores was determined by Spearman correlation with EDSS, and comparison of correlations between PDDS/BR and EDSS with the functional tests. We examined overall correct classification of disability categories (i.e., mild, moderate, or severe disability) by the PDDS/BR in relation to the EDSS. Test-retest reproducibility of PDDS/BR scores was examined in a subsample of 31 participants after 15 days. Results: There was a strong relationship between the PDDS/BR and EDSS scores (p = 0.723, p < 0.05). The correlations with TUG, T25FW, 6MWT, and 9HPT were comparable for the PDDS/BR and EDSS scores. Overall correct classification of disability categories by the PDDS/BR was 79.3%. Results indicated excellent test-retest reproducibility for the PDDS/BR (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient= 0.911, 95% CI: 0.685-0.918). Conclusion: The PDDS/BR scores provide a valid and reliable assessment of mobility disability and may be used by researchers and neurologists to assess disability status in Brazilians with MS.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 214
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis [J].
Benedict, Ralph H. B. ;
DeLuca, John ;
Phillips, Glenn ;
LaRocca, Nicholas ;
Hudson, Lynn D. ;
Rudick, Richard .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (05) :721-733
[2]  
Enright Paul L, 2003, Respir Care, V48, P783
[3]   Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls [J].
Goldman, Myla D. ;
Marrie, Ruth Ann ;
Cohen, Jeffrey A. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (03) :383-390
[4]  
GOODKIN DE, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P850
[5]   Tried and tested: the psychometric properties of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) in a population-based study [J].
Gray, O. M. ;
McDonnell, G. V. ;
Hawkins, S. A. .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2009, 15 (01) :75-80
[6]   DISEASE STEPS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - A SIMPLE APPROACH TO EVALUATE DISEASE PROGRESSION [J].
HOHOL, MJ ;
ORAV, EJ ;
WEINER, HL .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :251-255
[7]   The descriptive epidemiology of daily sitting time as a sedentary behavior in multiple sclerosis [J].
Hubbard, Elizabeth A. ;
Motl, Robert W. ;
Manns, Patricia J. .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (04) :594-601
[8]  
Izquierdo M, 1999, ACTA PHYSIOL SCAND, V167, P57
[9]  
Kaufman M, 2000, MULT SCLER, V6, P286, DOI 10.1177/135245850000600411
[10]  
KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444