Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Protein Profile and Oxidative Stress Status among Young Healthy Adult Smokers and Non-Smokers

被引:0
作者
Khan, Sadaf [1 ]
Aziz, Basma [1 ]
Ishrat, Urooj [1 ]
Zeb, Tehseen Fatima [1 ]
Amin, Rafat [1 ]
Ali, Shaukat [1 ]
机构
[1] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dow Coll Biotechnol, Ojha Campus, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2020年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
Saliva; Oxidative stress; Protein profile; Cigarette smoke; Reactive Oxygen Species; FLOW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate salivary protein-profile and oxidative stress status in young healthy adult smokers and non-smokers. Method: Saliva samples were collected from a total of 46 individuals, including non-smokers (n=26) and smokers (n=20) through drooling method. All participants were males, healthy and aged 18-35 years. Salivary flow rate and pH was noted. Total salivary protein concentration, oxidative stress status and amylase activity was measured by spectrophotometric assays. Salivary protein-profile was evaluated by SDS-PAGE. Results: Our results showed that salivary pH was significantly lowered in smokers. Significant increase in levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were found in smokers as compared to non-smokers (p<0.05). Significant difference was not found in total salivary protein concentration and amylase activity. However, differences were observed in frequency and intensity of protein bands. Seven predominant protein bands of molecular weight ranging from <11-100kDa were observed and frequency of <11kDa protein bands were found to be higher in smokers. Conclusion: Increased ROS levels in smokers indicate an oxidative imbalance in these subjects. Differences observed in salivary protein-profile needs further investigations centered on identifying whole salivary proteome which may help in determining early biomarkers for tobacco related oral diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Evaluation of salivary catalase, vitamin C, and alpha-amylase in smokers and non-smokers: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Ahmadi-Motamayel, Fatemeh ;
Falsafi, Parisa ;
Goodarzi, Mohammad Taghi ;
Poorolajal, Jalal .
JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2017, 46 (05) :377-380
[2]  
Ali N., 2020, Iptek J. Proc. Ser, V5, P1, DOI [10.12962/j23546026.y2020i5.7922, DOI 10.12962/J23546026.Y2020I5.7922]
[3]   Compliance with Saliva Collection Protocol in Healthy Volunteers: Strategies for Managing Risk and Errors [J].
Bhattarai, Kashi Raj ;
Kim, Hyung-Ryong ;
Chae, Han-Jung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 15 (08) :823-831
[4]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[5]   Role of Saliva and Salivary Diagnostics in the Advancement of Oral Health [J].
Dawes, C. ;
Wong, D. T. W. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 98 (02) :133-141
[6]   Temporary Modification of Salivary Protein Profile and Individual Responses to Repeated Phenolic Astringent Stimuli [J].
Dinnella, Caterina ;
Recchia, Annamaria ;
Vincenzi, Simone ;
Tuorila, Hely ;
Monteleone, Erminio .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2010, 35 (01) :75-85
[7]   Association of Xerostomia and Assessment of Salivary Flow Using Modified Schirmer Test among Smokers and Healthy Individuals: A Preliminutesary Study [J].
Dyasanoor, Sujata ;
Saddu, Shweta Channavir .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (01) :211-213
[8]  
Fattahi Bafghi Ali, 2015, Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, V27, P301
[9]   Hydroperoxide assay with the ferric-xylenol orange complex [J].
Gay, C ;
Collins, J ;
Gebicki, JM .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 273 (02) :149-155
[10]  
Grover Neeraj, 2016, J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, V20, P16, DOI 10.4103/0973-029X.180907