Integration of techno-economic and life cycle assessment: Defining and applying integration types for chemical technology development

被引:46
|
作者
Wunderlich, Johannes [1 ]
Armstrong, Katy [2 ]
Buchner, Georg A. [3 ]
Styring, Peter [2 ]
Schomaecker, Reinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Chem, Str 17 Juni 124, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Sheffield, UK Ctr Carbon Dioxide Utilisat, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sir Robert Hadfield Bldg, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Essigberg 3, D-94315 Straubing, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; LCA; DESIGN; ROUTES; ENERGY; MCDA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Both an environmental and an economic assessment are needed to judge the potential of sustainable chemical technologies. However, decision-makers may be challenged by conflicting conclusions. The integration of life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic assessment (TEA) can enhance decision making, as integrated assessments provide more information than a simple reporting of separate TEA and LCA results. The analysis of integration approaches reveals a lack of consistency in terms of defining criteria and methodological aspects for integration. A gap remains where guidance for practitioners is needed on how to select a suitable integration type for their different purposes. To fill this gap, we conclude that a one-size-fits-all solution of integration cannot adequately serve all purposes along the technology development phases. Therefore, a framework to guide through integration in three distinct parts is proposed. In Part I, a four-phase approach for every integrated assessment to link the results from TEA and LCA is defined. Part II develops three integration types classified by their core characteristics: qualitative discussion-based (Type A), quantitative combined indicator-based (Type B), and quantitative preference-based (Type C). Finally, in Part III, a step-by-step method to select the appropriate integration type according to the assessment purpose, while considering restrictions imposed by technology maturity and resource availability is introduced. Thus, the framework is a basis for increasing the number of integrated assessments by guiding practitioners towards tailored studies. Crown Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-economic integration evaluation in shale gas development based on ensemble learning
    Niu, Wente
    Lu, Jialiang
    Sun, Yuping
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Li, Qiaojing
    Cao, Xu
    Liang, Pingping
    Zhan, Hongming
    Applied Energy, 2024, 357
  • [22] Integrated Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment of Micellar Solvent Systems in Bulk Fine Chemical Production
    Wunderlich, Johannes
    Buchner, Georg A.
    Schwarze, Michael
    Schomaecker, Reinhard
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 63 (01) : 410 - 422
  • [23] Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment of three potential pathways for biomass liquefaction
    Patil, Akash
    Benavides, Pahola Thathiana
    Monceaux, Dale A.
    Engelberth, Abigail S.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 21
  • [24] Integration of membrane technology for decarbonization of gasification power plants: A techno-economic and environmental investigation
    Cormos, Ana-Maria
    Dragan, Simion
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 205
  • [25] Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Assessment of Lithium Recovery from Geothermal Brine
    Huang, Tai-Yuan
    Perez-Cardona, Jesus R.
    Zhao, Fu
    Sutherland, John W.
    Paranthaman, Mariappan Parans
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (19) : 6551 - 6560
  • [26] Techno-Economic Assessment of Happy Seeder Technology
    Sharma, Ankit
    Shawarma, Karun
    AMA-AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION IN ASIA AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA, 2023, 54 (01):
  • [27] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Fang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Yubing
    Liu, Yunfei
    Yu, Jiacheng
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Rashwan, Ahmed K.
    Chen, Zhonghao
    Chen, Lin
    Ihara, Ikko
    Rooney, David W.
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 22 (03) : 1115 - 1154
  • [28] Comparative techno-economic and life cycle assessment of electrocatalytic processes for lignin valorization
    Ebrahimpourboura, Zahra
    Mosalpuri, Manish
    Yang, Cheng
    Ponukumati, Aditya
    Stephenson, Corey
    Foston, Marcus
    Wright, Mark Mba
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2024, 26 (22) : 11303 - 11315
  • [29] Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Assessment Templates for Emerging Carbon Management Technologies
    Faber, Grant
    Mangin, Christophe
    Sick, Volker
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 2
  • [30] Blue and green ammonia production: A techno-economic and life cycle assessment perspective
    Mayer, Patricia
    Ramirez, Adrian
    Pezzella, Giuseppe
    Winter, Benedikt
    Sarathy, S. Mani
    Gascon, Jorge
    Bardow, Andre
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (08)