The Response of Growth and Yield of Canola Genotypes to Humic Acid Application in Different Plant Densities

被引:0
作者
Nasiri, Anaz [1 ]
Sam-Daliri, Morteza [1 ]
Shirani-Rad, AmirHossein [2 ]
Mousavi, AmirAbbas [1 ]
Jabbari, Hamid [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Agron, Chalus Branch, Chalus, Iran
[2] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Seed & Plant Improvement Inst SPII, Karaj, Iran
来源
GESUNDE PFLANZEN | 2021年 / 73卷 / 01期
关键词
Fatty acid; Glucosinolate; Harvest index; Oil percent; Physiological traits; SUBSTANCES; FOLIAR; L; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; FERTILIZATION; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; ABILITY; GREEN; SEED;
D O I
10.1007/s10343-020-00524-4
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To determine the effect of plant density and humic acid on canola yield, a 2-year field experiment was conducted as a factorial split-plot during the 2014-2016 cropping years. The factors included two humic acid levels (humic acid solution at 3/1000 [v/v] concentration and distilled water) and three plant densities (40, 60, and 80 plants per m(2)) in the main plots and six canola genotypes (Ahmadi, Okapi, Opera, Nafis, Karaj1, and SW102) in the subplot. The results showed a significant decrease in the grain and oil yield when plant density increased from 40 to 80 plants per m(2), by 57 and 59%, respectively. The oil quality was also effected by the plant density, so the erusic acid and glucosinolate contents increased twofold at 80 plants m(2). The grain and oil yield were significantly higher in plants treated with humic acid compared to controls, by 5.4 and 5.8%, respectively. Moreover, the foliar application of humic acid enhanced the oil quality of canola genotypes through a significant decrease in erusic acid and glucosinolate contents. However, there was no significant decreasing effect of humic acid on the density-induced yield loss and the oil yield reduction. Therefore, the increase in canola yield might be achieved by selecting the optimum density and improving the nutritional condition of the soil.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Senescence and yield responses to plant density in stay green and earlier-senescing maize hybrids from Argentina
    Antonietta, M.
    Fanello, D. D.
    Acciaresi, H. A.
    Guiamet, J. J.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 155 : 111 - 119
  • [2] The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth
    Atiyeh, RM
    Lee, S
    Edwards, CA
    Arancon, NQ
    Metzger, JD
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 84 (01) : 7 - 14
  • [3] Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture
    Canellas, Luciano P.
    Olivares, Fabio L.
    Aguiar, Natalia O.
    Jones, Davey L.
    Nebbioso, Antonio
    Mazzei, Pierluigi
    Piccolo, Alessandro
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2015, 196 : 15 - 27
  • [4] Effects of feeding extruded soybean, ground canola seed and whole cottonseed on ruminal fermentation, performance and milk fatty acid profile in early lactation-dairy cows
    Chen, P.
    Ji, P.
    Li, S. L.
    [J]. ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2008, 21 (02): : 204 - 213
  • [5] Rapid analyses of oil and fat content in agri-food products using continuous wave free precession time domain NMR
    Colnago, L. A.
    Azeredo, R. B. V.
    Marchi Netto, A.
    Andrade, F. D.
    Venancio, T.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN CHEMISTRY, 2011, 49 : S113 - S120
  • [6] Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat
    Delfine, S
    Tognetti, R
    Desiderio, E
    Alvino, A
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 25 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [7] A COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SUGARS
    DUBOIS, M
    GILLES, K
    HAMILTON, JK
    REBERS, PA
    SMITH, F
    [J]. NATURE, 1951, 168 (4265) : 167 - 167
  • [8] Dursun Atilla, 2002, Acta Agrobotanica, V55, P81
  • [9] Soybean yield and biomass responses to increasing plant population among diverse maturity groups: I. Agronomic characteristics
    Edwards, JT
    Purcell, LC
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (05) : 1770 - 1777
  • [10] El-Bassiouny H. S. M., 2014, Agricultural Sciences, V5, P687, DOI 10.4236/as.2014.58072