For which cancers might patients benefit most from expedited symptomatic diagnosis? Construction of a ranking order by a modified Delphi technique

被引:17
作者
Hamilton, Willie [1 ]
Stapley, Sally [1 ]
Campbell, Christine [2 ]
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios [3 ]
Rubin, Greg [4 ]
Neal, Richard D.
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter EX2 4TE, Devon, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
[4] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London WC1E 7HB, England
来源
BMC CANCER | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Cancer; Diagnosis; Primary health care; Modified Delphi technique; BREAST-CANCER; PRIMARY-CARE; SURVIVAL; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1865-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to answer the question 'for which cancers, in a symptomatic patient, does expediting the diagnosis provide an improvement in mortality and/or morbidity?' Methods: An initial ranking was constructed from previous work identifying 'avoidable deaths' for 21 common cancers in the UK. In a two-round modified Delphi exercise, 22 experts, all experienced across multiple cancers, used an evidence pack summarising recent relevant publications and their own experience to adjust this ranking. Participants also answered on a Likert scale whether they anticipated mortality or morbidity benefits for each cancer from expedited diagnosis. Results: Substantial changes in ranking occurred in the Delphi exercise. Finally, expedited diagnosis was judged to provide the greatest mortality benefit in breast cancer, uterine cancer and melanoma, and least in brain and pancreatic cancers. Three cancers, prostate, brain and pancreas, attracted a median answer of 'disagree' to whether they expected mortality benefits from expedited diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. Conclusions: Our results can guide future research, with emphasis given to studying interventions to improve symptomatic diagnosis of those cancers ranked highly. In contrast, research efforts for cancers with the lowest rankings could be re-directed towards alternative avenues more likely to yield benefit, such as screening or treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] 40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971-2011: a population-based study
    Quaresma, Manuela
    Coleman, Michel P.
    Rachet, Bernard
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9974) : 1206 - 1218
  • [22] The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England
    Richards, M. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 : S125 - S129
  • [23] Richards MA, 1999, LANCET, V353, P2155, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75588-4
  • [24] Diagnostic interval and mortality in colorectal cancer: U-shaped association demonstrated for three different datasets
    Torring, Marie Louise
    Frydenberg, Morten
    Hamilton, William
    Hansen, Rikke P.
    Lautrup, Marianne D.
    Vedsted, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (06) : 669 - 678
  • [25] Walker S, 2013, BJGP IN PRESS
  • [26] The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis
    Weller, D.
    Vedsted, P.
    Rubin, G.
    Walter, F. M.
    Emery, J.
    Scott, S.
    Campbell, C.
    Andersen, R. S.
    Hamilton, W.
    Olesen, F.
    Rose, P.
    Nafees, S.
    van Rijswijk, E.
    Hiom, S.
    Muth, C.
    Beyer, M.
    Neal, R. D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (07) : 1262 - 1267
  • [27] The epidemic' of melanoma between under- and overdiagnosis
    Weyers, Wolfgang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, 2012, 39 (01) : 9 - 16