Is marital status associated with quality of life?

被引:134
作者
Han, Kyu-Tae [1 ,2 ]
Park, Eun-Cheol [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sun Jung [1 ,2 ]
Park, Sohee [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Publ Hlth, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Hlth Serv Res, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch Publ, Dept Biostat, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
EQ-VAS; EQ-5D; Marital status; Quality of life; MENTAL-HEALTH; GENDER; DEPRESSION; MORBIDITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-014-0109-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The divorce rate has been increasing rapidly in Korea; the single rate and trends in divorce are also changing rapidly. This study aimed to examine the relationship between marital status and quality of life (QOL) in an attempt to understand these changes. We also investigated the relationship between QOL and marital status by age group. Methods: We used data from the Community Health Survey (2008: n = 200,800; 2009: n = 227,700; 2010: n = 229,229) administered by the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. After excluding 63,527 participants with incomplete information on QOL and/or marital status, the final analysis involved 594,202 participants. The analysis used t-tests and Chi-square tests to compare demographic variables between men and women, and ANOVA to compare QOL scores among comparison groups. We also performed a multilevel analysis on the relationship between QOL and marital status while accounting for the provincial differences. Results: The multilevel analysis by marital status showed that single men had significantly worse QOL (both EQ-VAS and EQ-5D) than married men. On the other hand, the QOL measured by EQ-VAS was better in single women than in married, and separated or divorced women. When QOL was assessed using EQ-5D, single and separated or divorced women had worse scores than married women. In the analysis by age group, the QOL of married men under the age of 30 years was lower than that of single men or men with marriage problems as measured by EQ-VAS. However, among 40-69-year-old men, married men had the highest QOL values. Similarly, for women in their 30s, single women had the highest EQ-VAS values, but for 40-69-year-old women, single women had lower EQ-VAS scores than married women. Conclusion: There was significant relationship between marital status and QOL, and this relationship appeared to differ by gender and age.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   MARITAL DISRUPTION AND DEPRESSION IN A COMMUNITY SAMPLE [J].
ASELTINE, RH ;
KESSLER, RC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 34 (03) :237-251
[2]   A multifaceted approach to the mental health advantage of the married - Assessing how explanations vary by outcome measure and unmarried group [J].
Bierman, A ;
Fazio, EM ;
Milkie, MA .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 2006, 27 (04) :554-582
[3]   Marital Status as Contingency for the Effects of Neighborhood Disorder on Older Adults' Mental Health [J].
Bierman, Alex .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2009, 64 (03) :425-434
[4]   Gender, Marital Power, and Marital Quality in Later Life [J].
Bulanda, Jennifer Roebuck .
JOURNAL OF WOMEN & AGING, 2011, 23 (01) :3-22
[5]   Physical Limitation and Emotional Well-Being: Gender and Marital Status Variations [J].
Caputo, Jennifer ;
Simon, Robin W. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 54 (02) :240-256
[6]   Marital status and mental health revisited: Examining the importance of risk factors and resources [J].
Cotten, SR .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 1999, 48 (03) :225-233
[7]   Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures [J].
Diener, E ;
Gohm, CL ;
Suh, E ;
Oishi, S .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 31 (04) :419-436
[8]  
EVANS DR, 1993, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V49, P477, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(199307)49:4<477::AID-JCLP2270490404>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-N
[10]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SEX ROLES, MARITAL STATUS, AND MENTAL-ILLNESS [J].
GOVE, WR .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1972, 51 (01) :34-+