Effects of Positive Human Contact during Gestation on the Behaviour, Physiology and Reproductive Performance of Sows

被引:10
作者
Hayes, Megan E. [1 ]
Hemsworth, Lauren M. [1 ]
Morrison, Rebecca S. [2 ]
Butler, Kym L. [1 ,3 ]
Rice, Maxine [1 ]
Rault, Jean-Loup [4 ]
Hemsworth, Paul H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Rivalea Australia Pty Ltd, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia
[3] Agr Victoria Res, Biometr Team, Dept Jobs Precincts & Reg, Hamilton, Vic 3300, Australia
[4] Univ Vet Med, Inst Anim Welf Sci, A-1210 Vienna, Austria
关键词
handling; positive human contact; stress; animal welfare; reproduction; sows;
D O I
10.3390/ani11010214
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Stress can compromise animal welfare and impact the productivity of farm animals. In intensive production systems where close interactions between stockpeople and animals occur regularly, human contact of a positive nature may facilitate stress resilience. This experiment studied the effects of human interaction on stress in pigs, by providing sows in their home pens with either regular positive handling by stockpeople or routine human contact. Stress resilience was studied by assessing the behaviour, physiology and productivity of pigs in these two treatments. Positive human contact was effective at reducing the fear responses of sows towards stockpeople conducting routine husbandry practices in the home pens. However, the positive handling treatment did not affect the behaviour of pigs towards other stressors imposed outside of the home pen, acute or basal physiological measures of stress or reproductive performance. Sows receiving positive handling showed reduced physical interaction with the stockpeople delivering the treatment over time, which may indicate habituation to the novel or possible rewarding elements of the human contact treatment. This work confirms that regular positive interaction with stockpeople does reduce the fear of sows to stockpeople, but does not always confer stress resilence. Previous positive interactions with humans may ameliorate the stress response of farm animals to aversive routine practices such as painful or stressful procedures, particularly those associated with stockpeople. We studied the effects of positive handling by providing younger (parity 1-2) and older (parity 3-8) sows housed in pens of fifteen (n = 24 pens in total) with either positive human contact (+HC) or routine human contact (control) during gestation. The +HC treatment involved a familiar stockperson patting and scratching sows and was imposed at a pen-level for 2 min daily. Measurements studied included behavioural, physiological and productivity variables. The +HC sows showed reduced avoidance of the stockperson conducting pregnancy testing and vaccination in the home pens, however the behavioural and cortisol responses of sows in a standard unfamiliar human approach test did not differ. There were no effects of +HC on aggression between sows, serum cortisol or serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations during gestation, or on the behavioural and cortisol response to being moved to farrowing crates. There were also no effects of +HC on the maternal responsiveness of sows, farrowing rate or the number of piglets born alive, stillborn or weaned. Sows in the +HC pens reduced their physical interaction with the stockpeople imposing the treatment after 2 weeks, which suggests the sows may have habituated to the novel or possible rewarding elements of the handling treatment. This experiment shows that regular positive interaction with stockpeople does reduce sows' fear of stockpeople, but does not always confer stress resilence.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Positive handling in late pregnancy and the consequences for maternal behaviour and production in sows [J].
Andersen, Inger Lise ;
Berg, Synne ;
Boe, Knut Egil ;
Edwards, Sandra .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2006, 99 (1-2) :64-76
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Genstat for Windows, V18th
[3]   Housing and road transport modify the brain neurotransmitter systems of pigs: Do pigs raised in different conditions cope differently with unknown environments? [J].
Arroyo, Laura ;
Valent, Daniel ;
Carreras, Ricard ;
Pena, Raquel ;
Sabria, Josefa ;
Velarde, Antonio ;
Bassols, Anna .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01)
[4]   Positive and negative gestational handling influences placental traits and mother-offspring behavior in dairy goats [J].
Baxter, Emma M. ;
Mulligan, Johan ;
Hall, Sarah A. ;
Donbavand, Jo E. ;
Palme, Rupert ;
Aldujaili, Emad ;
Zanella, Adroaldo J. ;
Dwyer, Cathy M. .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 157 :129-138
[5]   Human behaviour at the origin of maternal effects on offspring behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus) [J].
Bertin, Aline ;
Mocz, Frederique ;
Calandreau, Ludovic ;
Palme, Rupert ;
Lumineau, Sophie ;
Darmaillacq, Anne-Sophie ;
Dickel, Ludovic ;
Arnould, Cecile ;
Houdelier, Cecilia .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 201 :175-183
[6]   The perception of humans by piglets: recognition of familiar handlers and generalisation to unfamiliar humans [J].
Brajon, Sophie ;
Laforest, Jean-Paul ;
Bergeron, Renee ;
Tallet, Celine ;
Devillers, Nicolas .
ANIMAL COGNITION, 2015, 18 (06) :1299-1316
[7]   The Way Humans Behave Modulates the Emotional State of Piglets [J].
Brajon, Sophie ;
Laforest, Jean-Paul ;
Schmitt, Oceane ;
Devillers, Nicolas .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)
[8]   Effects of an intensified human-animal interaction on tail biting in pigs during the rearing period [J].
Buettner, Kathrin ;
Czycholl, Irena ;
Basler, Heidi ;
Krieter, Joachim .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 156 (08) :1039-1046
[9]   THE WELFARE OF PIGS IN 2 FARROWING LACTATION ENVIRONMENTS - CORTISOL RESPONSES OF SOWS [J].
CRONIN, GM ;
BARNETT, JL ;
HODGE, FM ;
SMITH, JA ;
MCCALLUM, TH .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1991, 32 (2-3) :117-127
[10]   The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs [J].
Day, JEL ;
Spoolder, HAM ;
Burfoot, A ;
Chamberlain, HL ;
Edwards, SA .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2002, 75 (03) :177-192