Domesticating the Drone: The Demilitarisation of Unmanned Aircraft for Civil Markets

被引:63
作者
Boucher, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, JRC, IPSC, Digital Citizen Secur Unit, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
关键词
RPAS; UAV; Drones; Responsible research and innovation; Dual-use;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-014-9603-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Remotely piloted aviation systems (RPAS) or 'drones' are well known for their military applications, but could also be used for a range of non-military applications for state, industrial, commercial and recreational purposes. The technology is advanced and regulatory changes are underway which will allow their use in domestic airspace. As well as the functional and economic benefits of a strong civil RPAS sector, the potential benefits for the military RPAS sector are also widely recognised. Several actors have nurtured this dual-use aspect of civil RPAS development. However, concerns have been raised about the public rejecting the technology because of their association with military applications and potentially controversial applications, for example in policing and border control. In contrast with the enthusiasm for dual-use exhibited throughout the EC consultation process, the strategy for avoiding public rejection devised in its roadmap would downplay the connection between military and non-military RPAS and focus upon less controversial applications such as search and rescue. We reflect upon this contrast in the context of the European agenda of responsible research and innovation. In doing so, we do not rely upon critique of drones per se, in their neither their civil nor military guise, but explore the extent to which current strategies for managing their public acceptability are compatible with a responsible and socially beneficial development of RPAS for civil purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1412
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Unmanned Aircraft: The Rising Risk of Hostile Takeover
    Dulo, Donna A.
    IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2015, 34 (03) : 17 - 19
  • [42] BVLOS Unmanned Aircraft Operations in Forest Environments
    Hartley, Robin John ap Lewis
    Henderson, Isaac Levi
    Jackson, Chris Lewis
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (07)
  • [43] Overview of the Nordic Challenges for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Kramar, Vadim
    Hinkula, Henry
    Kolli, Tanja
    Rauhala, Anssi
    Erkkila, Juha
    Roning, Juha
    30TH CONFERENCE OF OPEN INNOVATIONS ASSOCIATION FRUCT, 2021, : 86 - 98
  • [44] Unmanned Aircraft Systems: A Latin American Review and Analysis from the Colombian Context
    Sanchez-Zuluaga, Gabriel J.
    Isaza-Giraldo, Luisa
    Zapata-Madrigal, German Dario
    Garcia-Sierra, Rodolfo
    Candelo-Becerra, John E.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [45] Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs): Current State, Emerging Technologies, and Future Trends
    Ariante, Gennaro
    Del Core, Giuseppe
    DRONES, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [46] Unmanned Aerial Systems for Civil Applications: A Review
    Gonzalez-Jorge, Higinio
    Martinez-Sanchez, Joaquin
    Bueno, Martin
    Arias, Pedor
    DRONES, 2017, 1 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [47] Drone Disorientations HOW "UNMANNED" WEAPONS QUEER THE EXPERIENCE OF KILLING IN WAR
    Daggett, Cara
    INTERNATIONAL FEMINIST JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2015, 17 (03) : 361 - 379
  • [48] Analyzing unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) attacks; a disaster medicine perspective
    Shapovalov, Vadym
    Tran, Quincy K.
    Groussis, Maria
    Jasani, Gregory
    Tilley, Laura
    Pourmand, Ali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 84 : 135 - 140
  • [49] Localization of drone operator using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Preliminary research
    Magdalenic, Ivan
    Vrcek, Neven
    Tomas, Boris
    Guomundsson, Karl Solvi
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CECIIS 2022, 2022, : 335 - 339
  • [50] Context for Reproducibility and Replicability in Geospatial Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Howe, Cassandra
    Tullis, Jason A.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (17)