Domesticating the Drone: The Demilitarisation of Unmanned Aircraft for Civil Markets

被引:62
作者
Boucher, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, JRC, IPSC, Digital Citizen Secur Unit, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
关键词
RPAS; UAV; Drones; Responsible research and innovation; Dual-use;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-014-9603-3
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Remotely piloted aviation systems (RPAS) or 'drones' are well known for their military applications, but could also be used for a range of non-military applications for state, industrial, commercial and recreational purposes. The technology is advanced and regulatory changes are underway which will allow their use in domestic airspace. As well as the functional and economic benefits of a strong civil RPAS sector, the potential benefits for the military RPAS sector are also widely recognised. Several actors have nurtured this dual-use aspect of civil RPAS development. However, concerns have been raised about the public rejecting the technology because of their association with military applications and potentially controversial applications, for example in policing and border control. In contrast with the enthusiasm for dual-use exhibited throughout the EC consultation process, the strategy for avoiding public rejection devised in its roadmap would downplay the connection between military and non-military RPAS and focus upon less controversial applications such as search and rescue. We reflect upon this contrast in the context of the European agenda of responsible research and innovation. In doing so, we do not rely upon critique of drones per se, in their neither their civil nor military guise, but explore the extent to which current strategies for managing their public acceptability are compatible with a responsible and socially beneficial development of RPAS for civil purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1412
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential Data Link Candidates for Civilian Unmanned Aircraft Systems: A Survey
    Zolanvari, Maede
    Jain, Raj
    Salman, Tara
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2020, 22 (01): : 292 - 319
  • [32] Simulation of airborne collision between a drone and an aircraft nose
    Lu, Xiaohua
    Liu, Xinchao
    Zhang, Yingchun
    Li, Yulong
    Zuo, Hongfu
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 118
  • [33] Research and Development of Multipurpose Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Flying Drone)
    Al Muneem, Imran
    Fahim, Sakif Md
    Khan, Fazle Rabby
    Emon, Tanjir Ahmed
    Islam, Md Sabiul
    Khan, Mohammad Monirujjaman
    2021 IEEE 12TH ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2021, : 402 - 406
  • [34] UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES Opportunities, barriers, and the future of "drone journalism"
    Holton, Avery E.
    Lawson, Sean
    Love, Cynthia
    JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2015, 9 (05) : 634 - 650
  • [35] Infrastructure Assessment with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Henrickson, James V.
    Rogers, Cameron
    Lu, Han-Hsun
    Valasek, John
    Shi, Yeyin
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2016, : 933 - 942
  • [36] Attitude dynamics identification of unmanned aircraft vehicle
    Salman, Shaaban Ali
    Sreenatha, Anavatti G.
    Choi, Jin Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2006, 4 (06) : 782 - 787
  • [37] Concept and simulation of an unmanned agricultural spraying aircraft
    Teles Ribeiro da Silva, Joao Carlos
    Ismail, Kamal A. R.
    REVISTA AGROGEOAMBIENTAL, 2020, 12 (04) : 19 - 34
  • [38] Herbicide Ballistic Technology for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Rodriguez, Roberto
    Leary, James J. K.
    Jenkins, Daniel M.
    ROBOTICS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [39] DETECTION AND PREDICTION OF A PAIR OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT CONTACT
    Novak, Andrej
    Novak Sedlackova, Alena
    Pecho, Pavol
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2022, 34 (03): : 467 - 474
  • [40] BVLOS Unmanned Aircraft Operations in Forest Environments
    Hartley, Robin John ap Lewis
    Henderson, Isaac Levi
    Jackson, Chris Lewis
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (07)