Calibration of in situ magnetic susceptibility measurements

被引:47
|
作者
Gattacceca, J [1 ]
Eisenlohr, P [1 ]
Rochette, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille 3, CEREGE, CNRS, F-13545 Aix En Provence 4, France
关键词
calibration; contact probe; magnetic susceptibility; susceptibility profile; volume measurement;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02297.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The aim of this work is to calibrate a magnetic susceptibility field probe (SM30) in order to allow measurement on natural boulders of any shape and size. This calibration was performed through measurements on pebbles of different shapes, sizes and lithologies. We model a correction factor (geometric factor) that has to be applied to the SM30 measurement to obtain the real volume magnetic susceptibility of a sample of known volume. This geometric factor depends mostly on the volume of the sample, and to a lesser extent on its shape. We also present an original magnetic measurement scheme that provides, with three SM30 measurements at different distances, an estimation of the volume of a sample. By combining the two calibration models, it is possible to obtain the volume magnetic susceptibility of a natural sample with only three SM30 measurements, without requiring additional information such as sample volume. On the other hand, the calibration performed on a semi-infinite homogeneous body with variable measuring distance leads to a 2-D model of the SM30 response over its integration volume and allows the determination, with a sufficient number of discrete measurement at variable distance, of the thickness and susceptibility of the different layers of a composite body. Both types of calibration were successfully validated on natural or synthetic samples. Therefore the SM30 portable susceptometer appears to be a suitable instrument to perform in situ magnetic susceptibility measurement of individual boulders or to establish magnetic susceptibility profiles. In addition, the modest dimensions of the probe and the relative simplicity of the proposed measurement schemes should enable automation of the measurements that could find applications for robotic exploration of solid bodies of the solar system, for example.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VOLUME MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS BY NMR
    LAUWERS, HA
    VANDERKE.GP
    BULLETIN DES SOCIETES CHIMIQUES BELGES, 1966, 75 (3-4): : 238 - &
  • [32] STANDARD SUBSTANCES FOR MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS
    COSSEE, P
    JOURNAL OF INORGANIC & NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 1960, 14 (1-2): : 127 - 129
  • [33] In-situ calibration of acoustic measurements of suspended sediment
    Guo Jijie
    Ren inifa
    and Li Yunwu( Institute of Ocean Technology
    Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 1999, (04) : 3 - 5
  • [34] CALIBRATION OF GLASS MICROELECTRODES FOR IN-SITU PH MEASUREMENTS
    YANG, J
    BLANCHAR, RW
    HAMMER, RD
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (02) : 354 - 357
  • [35] In Situ Electrode Calibration Strategy for Voltammetric Measurements In Vivo
    Roberts, James G.
    Toups, J. Vincent
    Eyualem, Eyob
    McCarty, Gregory S.
    Sombers, Leslie A.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 85 (23) : 11568 - 11575
  • [36] New Approaches to In Situ Calibration for Seafloor Geodetic Measurements
    Wilcock, William S. D.
    Manalang, Dana A.
    Harrington, Michael J.
    Fredrickson, Erik K.
    Cram, Geoff
    Tilley, James
    Burnett, Justin
    Martin, Derek
    Kobayashi, Taro
    Paros, Jerome M.
    2018 OCEANS - MTS/IEEE KOBE TECHNO-OCEANS (OTO), 2018,
  • [37] Discrete element model calibration based on in situ measurements
    Keppler, Istvan
    Bablena, Adrienn
    Salman, Nihal D.
    Kiss, Peter
    ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2022, 39 (05) : 1947 - 1961
  • [38] A CONVENIENT SOLID FOR CALIBRATION OF THE GOUY MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY APPARATUS
    FIGGIS, BN
    NYHOLM, RS
    JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1958, (NOV): : 4190 - 4191
  • [39] A new tool for in situ measurements of the vertical distribution of magnetic susceptibility in soils as basis for mapping deposited dust
    Petrovsky, E
    Hulka, Z
    Kapicka, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 25 (09) : 1021 - 1029
  • [40] In situ "artificial plasma" calibration of tokamak magnetic sensors
    Shiraki, D.
    Levesque, J. P.
    Bialek, J.
    Byrne, P. J.
    DeBono, B. A.
    Mauel, M. E.
    Maurer, D. A.
    Navratil, G. A.
    Pedersen, T. S.
    Rath, N.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2013, 84 (06):