Comparative evaluation of the Minimally-Invasive Karyotyping (MINK) algorithm for non-invasive prenatal testing

被引:3
|
作者
Chu, Tianjiao [1 ,2 ]
Shaw, Patricia A. [2 ]
Yeniterzi, Suveyda [1 ,2 ]
Dunkel, Mary [1 ]
Rajkovic, Aleksander [1 ]
Hogge, W. Allen [1 ]
Bunce, Kimberly D. [2 ]
Peters, David G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Magee Womens Res Inst, Ctr Fetal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
MATERNAL PLASMA; DIAGNOSIS; ANEUPLOIDY; WISECONDOR; DNA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0171882
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Minimally Invasive Karyotyping (MINK) was communicated in 2009 as a novel method for the non-invasive detection of fetal copy number anomalies in maternal plasma DNA. The original manuscript illustrated the potential of MINK using a model system in which fragmented genomic DNA obtained from a trisomy 21 male individual was mixed with that of his karyotypically normal mother at dilutions representing fetal fractions found in maternal plasma. Although it has been previously shown that MINK is able to non-invasively detect fetal microdeletions, its utility for aneuploidy detection in maternal plasma has not previously been demonstrated. The current study illustrates the ability of MINK to detect common aneuploidy in early gestation, compares its performance to other published third party methods (and related software packages) for prenatal aneuploidy detection and evaluates the performance of these methods across a range of sequencing read inputs. Plasma samples were obtained from 416 pregnant women between gestational weeks 8.1 and 34.4. Shotgun DNA sequencing was performed and data analyzed using MINK RAPIDR and WISECONDOR. MINK performed with greater accuracy than RAPIDR and WISECONDOR, correctly identifying 60 out of 61 true trisomy cases, and reporting only one false positive in 355 normal pregnancies. Significantly, MINK achieved accurate detection of trisomy 21 using just 2 million aligned input reads, whereas WISECONDOR required 6 million reads and RAPIDR did not achieve complete accuracy at any read input tested. In conclusion, we demonstrate that MINK provides an analysis pipeline for the detection of fetal aneuploidy in samples of maternal plasma DNA.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The Effect of Freezing on Non-invasive Prenatal Testing
    Xie, Xiaolei
    Li, Fuguang
    Tan, Weihe
    Yin, Weiguo
    Chen, Feiyan
    Guo, Xiaoyan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [12] Novel Algorithms for Improved Sensitivity in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
    Johansson, L. F.
    de Boer, E. N.
    de Weerd, H. A.
    van Dijk, F.
    Elferink, M. G.
    Schuring-Blom, G. H.
    Suijkerbuijk, R. F.
    Sinke, R. J.
    te Meerman, G. J.
    Sijmons, R. H.
    Swertz, M. A.
    Sikkema-Raddatz, B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [13] Non-invasive prenatal testing: more questions than answers
    Yagel, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (04) : 369 - 372
  • [14] RAPIDR: an analysis package for non-invasive prenatal testing of aneuploidy
    Lo, Kitty K.
    Boustred, Christopher
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Plagnol, Vincent
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 30 (20) : 2965 - 2967
  • [15] Future Science Prize goes to non-invasive prenatal testing
    Li, Kang
    Duan, Yaou
    Ting, Magdalene Yin Lin
    Ou, Zhiying
    Liu, Li
    Zhang, Kang
    Fu, Xin
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 60 (04) : 429 - 431
  • [16] Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
    Cserhati, Matthew
    BIOTECH, 2021, 10 (03):
  • [17] Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies
    Beulen, L.
    Faas, B. H. W.
    Feenstra, I.
    Van Vugt, J. M. G.
    Bekker, M. N.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (06) : 721 - 728
  • [18] Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing by semiconductor sequencing in a genetic laboratory
    Dheedene, Annelies
    Sante, Tom
    De Smet, Matthias
    Vanbellinghen, Jean-Francois
    Grisart, Bernard
    Vergult, Sarah
    Janssens, Sandra
    Menten, Bjorn
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 36 (08) : 699 - 707
  • [19] The importance of determining the limit of detection of non-invasive prenatal testing methods
    Fiorentino, Francesco
    Bono, Sara
    Pizzuti, Francesca
    Mariano, Martina
    Polverari, Arianna
    Duca, Sara
    Sessa, Mariateresa
    Baldi, Marina
    Diano, Laura
    Spinella, Francesca
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 36 (04) : 304 - 311
  • [20] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Jayashankar, Siva Shantini
    Nasaruddin, Muhammad Luqman
    Hassan, Muhammad Faiz
    Dasrilsyah, Rima Anggrena
    Shafiee, Mohamad Nasir
    Ismail, Noor Akmal Shareela
    Alias, Ekram
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)