Assessing the performance of an MBR operated at high biomass concentrations

被引:35
作者
Barreto, Carlos M. [1 ,3 ]
Garcia, Hector A. [1 ]
Hooijmans, Christine M. [1 ]
Herrera, Aridai [2 ]
Brdjanovic, Damir [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, Dept Environm Engn & Water Technol, Westvest 7, NL-2611 AX Delft, Netherlands
[2] JCI Ind Inc, 1161 SE Hamblen Rd Lees Summit, Kansas City, MO 64081 USA
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biotechnol, Van der Maasweg 9, NL-2629 HZ Delft, Netherlands
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Oxygen transfer; High MLSS; Oxygen uptake rate (OUR); Filterability; Emergency sanitation; OXYGEN-TRANSFER; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; SUSPENDED-SOLIDS; AERATION; FILTERABILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.006
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Reducing the footprint requirements of membrane bioreactors (MBR)s can both decrease the surface area needs for new wastewater treatment plants (WWTP)s, and increase the treatment capacities of existing WWTPs at a given surface area. In addition, it may promote the development of movable/portable containerized MBRs for a diverse range of wastewater treatment applications. Applications may include the provision of municipal/industrial wastewater treatment in remote areas without sewerage, and the provision of sanitation services under challenging site-specific conditions such as after the occurrence of a human-made or a natural disaster. The reduction of the footprint requirements of MBRs is constrained by the maximum amount of biomass that can be accommodated in the aerobic basin. The biomass concentration is mainly limited by the extremely low oxygen transfer efficiency (OTE) experienced by conventional aeration bubble diffuser systems at mixed liquor total suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations higher than 20 g L-1. Another potential limitation for the operation of MBRs at such high MISS concentrations is the reduction on the membrane permeability due to excessive fouling. A pilot MBR with a treatment capacity of one m(3) d(-1) was installed at the research hall facilities at the Harnaschpolder wastewater treatment plant in Delft, The Netherlands. The MBR was operated at MISS concentrations of up to 28 g L-1 at sludge retention times (SRT)s ranging from 30 to 35 days. The MBR was provided with a Speece cone concentrated oxygen delivery system to overcome the oxygen transfer limitations of conventional bubble diffuser aeration systems at high MLSS concentrations. The MBR performance was evaluated by monitoring the influent and effluent water quality, the membrane permeability, the sludge filterability, the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, and the oxygen uptake rate (OUR). The Speece cone proved to be effective in delivering enough oxygen to maintain DO concentrations in the MBR of approximately 2 mg L-1 at MISS concentrations of up to 22 g L-1. OUR values above 200 mg L-1 h(-1) were observed at 14 g L-1 MISS and higher than 300 mg L-1 h(-1) at 22 g L-1 MISS. The MBR exhibited chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies of up to 99% even at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) as low as 3.7 h. A reduction in permeability from 33 to 11 lmh bar(-1) was observed when the MISS concentrations increased from 18.7 to 27.8 g L-1. Sludge filterability values expressed as the added resistance (Delta R-20) fell in the range of "poor filterability" for all the evaluated operational conditions; however, a lower filtration resistance in the range of "moderate filterability" at approximately 23 g L-1 MLSS was noticed. The experimental results suggest that at the evaluated experimental conditions the existent limitations on poor oxygen transfer and low permeability when operating a MBR at high MLSS concentrations can be overcome; therefore, the footprint requirements of MBR systems may be further reduced. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 537
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Arceivala S. J., 2008, WASTEWATER TREATMENT, V3rd ed
[2]   Oxygenation performance of a laboratory-scale Speece Cone hypolimnetic aerator: preliminary assessment [J].
Ashley, K. I. ;
Mavinic, D. S. ;
Hall, K. J. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (07) :663-675
[3]  
Awwa A., 1998, STAND METHODS EXAM W, V20
[4]   Membrane biofouling process correlated to the microbial community succession in an A/O MBR [J].
Chen, Chun-Hong ;
Fu, Yuan ;
Gao, Da-Wen .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 197 :185-192
[5]   Investigation of oxygen transfer rates in full scale membrane bioreactors [J].
Cornel, P ;
Wagner, M ;
Krause, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (11) :313-319
[6]   Relationships between mixed liquor properties, operating conditions and fouling on two full-scale MBR plants [J].
Delrue, F. ;
Stricker, A. E. ;
Mietton-Peuchot, M. ;
Racault, Y. .
DESALINATION, 2011, 272 (1-3) :9-19
[7]   Novel low-fouling membrane bioreactor (MBR) for industrial wastewater treatment [J].
Deowan, Shamim Ahmed ;
Galiano, Francesco ;
Hoinkis, Jan ;
Johnson, Daniel ;
Altinkaya, Sacide Alsoy ;
Gabriele, Bartolo ;
Hilal, Nidal ;
Drioli, Enrico ;
Figoli, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2016, 510 :524-532
[8]   Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures [J].
Drews, Anja .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2010, 363 (1-2) :1-28
[9]   Impact of suspended solids on the activated sludge non-newtonian behaviour and on oxygen transfer in a bubble column [J].
Duran, C. ;
Fayolle, Y. ;
Pechaud, Y. ;
Cockx, A. ;
Gillot, S. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 141 :154-165
[10]   Filtration characterisation for assessing MBR performance: three cases compared [J].
Evenblij, H ;
Geilvoet, S ;
van der Graaf, JHJM ;
van der Roest, HF .
DESALINATION, 2005, 178 (1-3) :115-124