Addressing structural and observational uncertainty in resource management

被引:37
作者
Fackler, Paul [1 ]
Pacifici, Krishna [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Adaptive management; Natural resources; Partial observability; Partially observable Markov decision process; Structural uncertainty; ADAPTIVE-MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Most natural resource management and conservation problems are plagued with high levels of uncertainties, which make good decision making difficult. Although some kinds of uncertainties are easily incorporated into decision making, two types of uncertainty present more formidable difficulties. The first, structural uncertainty, represents our imperfect knowledge about how a managed system behaves. The second, observational uncertainty, arises because the state of the system must be inferred from imperfect monitoring systems. The former type of uncertainty has been addressed in ecology using Adaptive Management (AM) and the latter using the Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDP) framework. Here we present a unifying framework that extends standard POMDPs and encompasses both standard POMDPs and AM. The approach allows any system variable to be observed or not observed and uses any relevant observed variable to update beliefs about unknown variables and parameters. This extends standard AM, which only uses realizations of the state variable to update beliefs and extends standard POMDP by allowing more general stochastic dependence among the observable variables and the state variables. This framework enables both structural and observational uncertainty to be simultaneously modeled. We illustrate the features of the extended POMDP framework with an example. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, ANAL MANAGEMENT ANIM
  • [3] A Closer Look at MOMDPs
    Araya-Lopez, Mauricio
    Thomas, Vincent
    Buffet, Olivier
    Charpillet, Francois
    [J]. 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2010), PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, 2010, : 197 - 204
  • [4] Boyen X., 1998, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference (1998), P33
  • [5] Parametric POMDPs for planning in continuous state spaces
    Brooks, Alex
    Makarenko, Alexei
    Williams, Stefan
    Durrant-Whyte, Hugh
    [J]. ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2006, 54 (11) : 887 - 897
  • [6] Chades I., 2012, 26 AAAI C ART INT AA
  • [7] When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species
    Chades, Iadine
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    McCarthy, Michael A.
    Wintle, Brendan
    Linkie, Matthew
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (37) : 13936 - 13940
  • [8] General rules for managing and surveying networks of pests, diseases, and endangered species
    Chades, Iadine
    Martin, Tara G.
    Nicol, Samuel
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (20) : 8323 - 8328
  • [9] Conservation in the face of climate change: The roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty
    Conroy, Michael J.
    Runge, Michael C.
    Nichols, James D.
    Stodola, Kirk W.
    Cooper, Robert J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (04) : 1204 - 1213
  • [10] Crowe B, 2007, AUSTR AGR RES EC SOC