Microvascular decompression versus stereotactic radiosurgery as primary treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective comparative trials

被引:40
作者
Sharma, Ravi [1 ]
Phalak, Manoj [1 ]
Katiyar, Varidh [1 ]
Borkar, Sachin [1 ]
Kale, Shashank S. [1 ]
Mahapatra, Ashok K. [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Gamma knife therapy; meta-analysis; microvascular decompression; stereotactic radiosurgery; trigeminal neuralgia; SURGERY;
D O I
10.4103/0028-3886.232342
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: The current opinion among neurosurgeons regarding the selection between microvascular decompression (MVD) and gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia is not based on clear evidence. In this meta-analysis, we have attempted to synthesize the findings of the prospective trials comparing the efficacy and complications of the two procedures as primary treatment modality for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Materials and Methods: The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed for manuscripts comparing the efficacy or complications of MVD and stereotactic radiosurgery for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. The data of the identified studies was pooled and a meta-analysis was done. Results: Five prospective studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were identified. The mean age of the patients subjected to gamma knife therapy (GKT) was more than those who underwent MVD. The initial success rate in the pooled data with MVD was 96% (95% confidence interval [C.I.] 93.3%-98.6%) as compared to GKT which was 71.8% (95% C.I. 64.9%-78.7%) with the ratio of 1.309 (95% C.I. 1.217-1.409; P = < 0.001). This superiority was sustained till the last follow up available in all the studies. Out of the complications common to both procedures, MVD had a lower rate of facial numbness, with a risk ratio of 0.481 (95% C.I. 0.297-0.778); and dysesthetic pain, with a risk ratio of 0.470 (95% C.I. 0.172-1.286). Conclusions: MVD seems to be more efficacious than GKT as a first line treatment for trigeminal neuralgia immediately as well as on a long term basis. However, the dilemma regarding the choice of treatment to be adopted still remains for special subgroups of patients, like the elderly patients and those in whom no vascular compression has been found during surgery. Further studies are needed for elucidating the unequivocal treatment plan under these circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 694
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia [J].
Barker, FG ;
Jannetta, PJ ;
Bissonette, DJ ;
Larkins, MV ;
Jho, HD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (17) :1077-1083
[2]   Trigeminal neuralgia and its management [J].
Bennetto, Luke ;
Patel, Nikunj K. ;
Fuller, Geraint .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7586) :201-205
[3]  
Berger I, 2017, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V9, DOI 10.7759/cureus.1000
[4]   Microvascular decompression vs. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for typical trigeminal neuralgia: Preliminary findings [J].
Brisman, Ronald .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 85 (2-3) :94-98
[5]  
Dandy W., 1934, AM J SURG, V24, P447, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(34)90403-7
[6]   CONCERNING MECHANISM OF TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA AND HEMIFACIAL SPASM [J].
GARDNER, WJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1962, 19 (11) :947-+
[8]   A prospective cohort study of microvascular decompression and Gamma Knife surgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia [J].
Linskey, Mark E. ;
Ratanatharathorn, Vaneerat ;
Penagaricano, Jose .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 109 :160-172
[9]   Microstructural abnormalities in the trigeminal nerves of patients with trigeminal neuralgia revealed by multiple diffusion metrics [J].
Liu, Yaou ;
Li, Jiping ;
Butzkueven, Helmut ;
Duan, Yunyun ;
Zhang, Mo ;
Shu, Ni ;
Li, Yongjie ;
Zhang, Yuqing ;
Li, Kuncheng .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (05) :783-786
[10]   Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers' to authors' assessments [J].
Lo, Carson Ka-Lok ;
Mertz, Dominik ;
Loeb, Mark .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14