Invariance Testing of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale

被引:3
作者
Baker, Russell T. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [1 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [1 ]
Baker, Jayme G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, 875 Perimeter Dr, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID USA
关键词
instrument development; confirmatory factor analysis; multigroup invariance testing; covariance modeling; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL SCALE; DECISION-MAKING; FIT INDEXES; PART II;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-0302.19
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: The increased emphasis on implementing evidence-based practice has reinforced the need to more accurately assess patient improvement. Psychometrically sound, patient-reported outcome measures are essential for evaluating patient care. A patient-reported outcome instrument that may be useful for clinicians is the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale (DPAS). Before adopting this scale, however, researchers must evaluate its psychometric properties, particularly across subpopulations. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the DPAS in a large sample using confirmatory factor analysis procedures and assess structural invariance of the scale across sex, age, injury status, and athletic status groups. Design: Observational study. Setting: Twenty-two clinical sites. Patients or Other Participants: Of 1445 physically active individuals recruited from multiple athletic training clinical sites, data from 1276 were included in the analysis. Respondents were either healthy or experiencing an acute, subacute, or persistent musculoskeletal injury. Main Outcome Measure(s): A confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the full sample, and multigroup invariance testing was conducted to assess differences across sex, age, injury status, and athletic status. Given the poor model fit, alternate model generation was used to identify a more parsimonious factor structure. Results: The DPAS did not meet contemporary fit index recommendations or the criteria to demonstrate structural invariance. We identified an 8-item model that met the model fit recommendations using alternate model generation. Conclusions: The 16-item DPAS did not meet the model fit recommendations and may not be the most parsimonious or reliable measure for assessing disablement and quality of life. Use of the 16-item DPAS across subpopulations of interest is not recommended. More examination involving a true cross-validation sample should be completed on the 8-item DPAS before this scale is adopted in research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1189
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy
    Abrams, D
    Davidson, M
    Harrick, J
    Harcourt, P
    Zylinski, M
    Clancy, J
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, APPL PROGRAMMING
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, Using multivariate statistics
  • [4] [Anonymous], CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language
  • [6] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale and Preliminary Testing of Short-Form Versions: A Calibration and Validation Study
    Baker, Russell T.
    Burton, Damon
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Start, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2019, 54 (03) : 302 - 318
  • [7] Bryant FB, 1995, PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS
  • [8] Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance
    Chen, Fang Fang
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) : 464 - 504
  • [9] Development and application of clinical prediction rules to improve decision making in physical therapist practice
    Childs, JD
    Cleland, JA
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (01): : 122 - 131
  • [10] Cohen L., 2011, RES METHODS ED, V7th, DOI 10.4324/9781315456539-14