The Use of "Canaries" for Adaptive Health Management of Electronic Systems

被引:0
作者
Dasgupta, Abhijit [1 ]
Doraiswami, Ravi [1 ]
Azarian, Michael [1 ]
Osterman, Michael [1 ]
Mathew, Sony [1 ]
Pecht, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, CALCE, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADAPTIVE AND SELF-ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (ADAPTIVE 2010) | 2010年
关键词
canary; electronic systems; failure mechanisms; precursors; prognostics; reliability; remaining useful life; PROGNOSTICS; SOLDER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Reliability concerns in state-of- the-art electronic systems have led researchers and engineers to develop innovative real- time prognostics and adaptive health management methods to assure desired availability. Prognostics techniques described here use a novel concept of canaries, along with data analysis, failure mechanism models and integrated fusion techniques to determine the remaining useful life of a system. A canary is a device that provides data to generate early warning of functional degradation and impending functional failure. Three types of canaries are discussed. Expendable canaries experience accelerated degradation (compared to functional degradation) by design, so that early warning of impending failure can be generated. Sensory canaries provide early warning by observing nonfunctional manifestation of functional degradation. Conjugate-stress canaries provide measurement of life- cycle stress history so that failure models can be used to estimate consumed life and remaining life. This paper focuses on expendable canaries, in particular, and provides three examples to illustrate the underlying design concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 183
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Al-Jumah A. A., 1998, ISCAS '98. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.98CH36187), P304, DOI 10.1109/ISCAS.1998.706919
[2]  
Anderson N., 2004, P INT MIL AER AV COT
[3]  
[Anonymous], RAC J
[4]  
Brotherton T, 2000, AEROSP CONF PROC, P163, DOI 10.1109/AERO.2000.877892
[5]  
Byington CS, 2003, AUTOTESTCON 2003, PROCEEDINGS, P320
[6]  
Calhoun B.H., 2004, IEEE J SOLID STATE C, V39
[7]   COMPARISON OF ELECTRONICS-RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT APPROACHES [J].
CUSHING, MJ ;
MORTIN, DE ;
STADTERMAN, TJ ;
MALHOTRA, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1993, 42 (04) :542-546
[8]  
Dasgupta A., 1992, Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Electronic Packaging, V114, P152, DOI 10.1115/1.2906412
[9]  
DEV N, 1997, P INN APPL ART INT
[10]  
DUFFAUT O, 1993, P TOOLDIAG INT C FAU, P230