Variation in Provision of Collaborative Medication Reviews on Entry to Long-Term Care Facilities

被引:24
作者
Sluggett, Janet K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bell, J. Simon [3 ,4 ]
Lang, Catherine [2 ]
Corlis, Megan [1 ]
Whitehead, Craig [5 ]
Wesselingh, Steve L. [2 ]
Inacio, Maria C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA Allied Hlth & Human Performance, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Aged & Palliat Care, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Medication review; medication management; long-term care; nursing homes; residential aged care; Australia; MEDICINES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.027
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are comprehensive medication reviews conducted by clinical pharmacists and general medical practitioners. RMMRs are the primary government-funded service to optimize medication management in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and are recommended for all new residents. This study investigated resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision within 90 days of RACF entry and national intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Design: National retrospective cohort study. Setting and Participants: Individuals aged >65 years who first entered permanent residential aged care in Australia between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015, received at least 1 medication in the previous year, and were alive at 90 days post-RACF entry. Methods: Resident characteristics associated with timely RMMR provision were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Crude and risk-adjusted funnel plots were used to examine intrafacility variation in timely RMMR provision. Results: Of the 143,676 residents from 2799 RACFs included, 30,883 (21.5%) received an RMMR within 90 days. Resident characteristics associated with timely provision included dementia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.08), primary language other than English (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), number of unique prescriptions dispensed in the previous year (aOR [per additional 5 prescriptions] 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), need for medication administration assistance (aORs ranged from 1.35 to 1.42, compared with residents self-managing) and facility remoteness (aORs ranged from 0.67 to 0.75 for residents outside major cities). The proportion of new residents receiving a timely RMMR ranged from 0% (n = 303 RACFs) to 100% (n = 4 RACFs). There were 174 RACFs (6.2%) in which >50% of new residents received a timely RMMR. Conclusions and Implications: Although there was some evidence that RMMRs are targeted to individuals with a greater burden of medication use and those living with dementia, considerable variation in provision exists nationally. This flagship medication review service is generally underutilized among residents of Australian RACFs. (C) 2020 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, AUSTR STAND GEOGR CL
  • [2] Australian Government Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, 2020, RES CAR SECT PERF
  • [3] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2012, GUID PRINC MED MAN R
  • [4] Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2013, AG CAR FUND INSTR AC
  • [5] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2019, MED SUBS GP ALL HLTH
  • [6] Carnell K., 2017, Review of National Aged Care Quality Regulatory Processes
  • [7] Process, impact and outcomes of medication review in Australian residential aged care facilities: A systematic review
    Chen, Esa Y. H.
    Wang, Kate N.
    Sluggett, Janet K.
    Ilomaki, Jenni
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    Corlis, Megan
    Bell, J. Simon
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2019, 38 : 9 - 25
  • [8] Pharmacist-Led Home Medicines Review and Residential Medication Management Review: The Australian Model
    Chen, Timothy F.
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2016, 33 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [9] Home medicines reviews and residential medication management reviews in Western Australia
    Czarniak, Petra
    Hattingh, Laetitia
    Si, Tin Fei
    Parsons, Richard
    Wright, Bronwen
    Sunderland, Bruce
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (02) : 567 - 578
  • [10] Patterns of high-risk prescribing and other factors in relation to receipt of a home medicines review: a prospective cohort investigation among adults aged 45 years and over in Australia
    Du, Wei
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Pearson, Sallie-Anne
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Blyth, Fiona
    Viney, Rosalie
    Joshy, Grace
    Day, Cathy
    Banks, Emily
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):