Progression-free survival and one-year milestone survival as surrogates for overall survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

被引:12
作者
Zhao, Shen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Zhonghan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yaxiong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hong, Shaodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Yunpeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fang, Wenfeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Hongyun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
advanced non-small cell lung cancer; surrogate endpoint; progression-free survival; milestone survival; END-POINTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-II; DISEASE PROGRESSION; RESPONSE RATE; DOCETAXEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; ERLOTINIB;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.31995
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The advent of immunotherapy leads to greater availability of effective subsequent treatments and extended survival in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), complicating the evaluation of overall survival (OS) in second-line NSCLC trials. Here, we aimed to assess the surrogacy of progression-free survival (PFS) and milestone survival for OS in second-line NSCLC trials investigating chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, respectively. We systemically searched for active-controlled, second-line NSCLC trials. The milestone time point was set at one-year based on pre-analysis. A two-stage meta-analytic validation model was adopted to assess associations between surrogate endpoint (SE) and OS and associations between treatment effects on SE and OS. Treatment effects on SE and OS were expressed as PFS hazard ratios (HRPFS), 1 yr-milestone ratio (Ratio(1y-SUR)) and HROS. Subgroup analyses stratified by treatment types and trial publication years evaluated the surrogacy in different clinical contexts. The study included 50 trials with 22,804 patients. One-year survival strongly correlated with OS (R-2[95% confidence interval]: one-year survival -median OS = 0.707 [0.704-0.708]; Ratio(1y-SUR)-HROS = 0.829 [0.828-0.831]). No correlation was established between PFS and OS (median PFS-median OS = 0.100 [0.098-0.101]; HRPFS-HROS = 0.064 [0.059-0.069]), except in immunotherapy subgroup (HRPFS-HROS = 0.835 [0.791-0.918]). In subgroup analyses, surrogacy of one-year survival persisted in different clinical contexts, and the disassociation between PFS and OS persisted in recent trials. One-year milestone survival showed strong surrogacy for OS in second-line NSCLC trials. Although no association was identified between PFS and OS, the strong HRPFS-HROS correlation in immunotherapy trials indicates the potential of PFS as a SE in NSCLC trials involving immunotherapies. What's new? The advent of immunotherapy has provided previously-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with more subsequent treatment options. The evaluation of overall survival (OS) in second-line NSCLC trials has however become more complicated and time-consuming due to potential confounding effects, calling for the identification of surrogate endpoints. This literature-based study of 50 trials identified strong correlations between one-year survival and OS, supporting the use of milestone survival as a surrogate endpoint in future NSCLC trials. No correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and OS was established. However, the strong HRPFS-HROS correlation in the immunotherapy subgroup suggested its potential utility in immunotherapy trials.
引用
收藏
页码:2854 / 2866
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Immuno-oncology Trial Endpoints: Capturing Clinically Meaningful Activity [J].
Anagnostou, Valsamo ;
Yarchoan, Mark ;
Hansen, Aaron R. ;
Wang, Hao ;
Verde, Franco ;
Sharon, Elad ;
Collyar, Deborah ;
Chow, Laura Q. M. ;
Forde, Patrick M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (17) :4959-4969
[2]  
[Anonymous], JAMA ONCOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], J NATL CANC I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BMJ, V343, pd5928, DOI [DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928, 10.1136/bmj.d5928]
[5]   Surrogate Endpoint Analysis: An Exercise in Extrapolation [J].
Baker, Stuart G. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (05) :316-320
[6]   Overall Response Rate, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival With Targeted and Standard Therapies in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: US Food and Drug Administration Trial-Level and Patient-Level Analyses [J].
Blumenthal, Gideon M. ;
Karuri, Stella W. ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Khozin, Sean ;
Kazandjian, Dickran ;
Tang, Shenghui ;
Sridhara, Rajeshwari ;
Keegan, Patricia ;
Pazdur, Richard .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (09) :1008-+
[7]   Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Borghaei, H. ;
Paz-Ares, L. ;
Horn, L. ;
Spigel, D. R. ;
Steins, M. ;
Ready, N. E. ;
Chow, L. Q. ;
Vokes, E. E. ;
Felip, E. ;
Holgado, E. ;
Barlesi, F. ;
Kohlhaeufl, M. ;
Arrieta, O. ;
Burgio, M. A. ;
Fayette, J. ;
Lena, H. ;
Poddubskaya, E. ;
Gerber, D. E. ;
Gettinger, S. N. ;
Rudin, C. M. ;
Rizvi, N. ;
Crino, L. ;
Blumenschein, G. R. ;
Antonia, S. J. ;
Dorange, C. ;
Harbison, C. T. ;
Finckenstein, F. Graf ;
Brahmer, J. R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (17) :1627-1639
[8]   Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Brahmer, Julie ;
Reckamp, Karen L. ;
Baas, Paul ;
Crino, Lucio ;
Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E. ;
Poddubskaya, Elena ;
Antonia, Scott ;
Pluzanski, Adam ;
Vokes, Everett E. ;
Holgado, Esther ;
Waterhouse, David ;
Ready, Neal ;
Gainor, Justin ;
Aren Frontera, Osvaldo ;
Havel, Libor ;
Steins, Martin ;
Garassino, Marina C. ;
Aerts, Joachim G. ;
Domine, Manuel ;
Paz-Ares, Luis ;
Reck, Martin ;
Baudelet, Christine ;
Harbison, Christopher T. ;
Lestini, Brian ;
Spigel, David R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (02) :123-135
[9]   INDEXES AND BOUNDARIES FOR QUANTITATIVE SIGNIFICANCE IN STATISTICAL DECISIONS [J].
BURNAND, B ;
KERNAN, WN ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (12) :1273-1284
[10]  
Buyse M, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P49, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49