Social mission as competitive advantage: A configurational analysis of the strategic conditions of social entrepreneurship

被引:96
作者
Munoz, Pablo [1 ,3 ]
Kimmitt, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Chatham St, Chatham L69 7ZH, Kent, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Business, 5 Barrack Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4SE, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Desarrollo, Sch Business & Econ, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Social entrepreneurship; Competitive advantage; Social mission; Mission drift; Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; ENTERPRISES; MICROFINANCE; INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; DRIFT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.044
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In social entrepreneurship, social and economic missions co-exist in a tensioned balance. At times, business survival requires reprioritizing objectives, leading social entrepreneurs to drift away from social values in pursuit of commercial gains. This requires (re)balancing acts aimed at mitigating the effects of drift. Although critical for business survival, the micro antecedents of this balancing act remain uncovered. This study explores the complex interactions between the strategic conditions of social entrepreneurs in the development of market-oriented social missions. Drawing on a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of 111 social entrepreneurs in Chile, this study reveals four alternative combinations of strategic conditions that explain why the social mission of a social entrepreneur can be perceived as being valuable for achieving a competitive advantage. The findings contribute to a more complex understanding of the set of conditions involved in the balancing act between social and economic missions in social entrepreneurship. This study calls into question the binary assumption underlying the commitment of social entrepreneurs to their social mission.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 861
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENTREP THEORY PRACT
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAT SOC ENT SURV 20
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
[4]   Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? [J].
Austin, J ;
Stevenson, H ;
Wei-Skillern, J .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (01) :1-22
[5]   Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Lee, Matthew .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2014, 8 (01) :397-441
[6]   HARNESSING PRODUCTIVE TENSIONS IN HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF WORK INTEGRATION SOCIAL ENTERPRISES [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Sengul, Metin ;
Pache, Anne-Claire ;
Model, Jacob .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (06) :1658-1685
[7]   BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Dorado, Silvia .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 53 (06) :1419-1440
[8]   How performance measurement influences stakeholders in not-for-profit organizations [J].
Beer, Haley Allison ;
Micheli, Pietro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2017, 37 (09) :1164-1184
[9]  
Bradley SW, 2012, J MANAGE STUD, V49, P684, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01043.x, 10.1111/J.1467-6486.2012.01043.X]
[10]   Diversity management for innovation in social enterprises in the UK [J].
Bridgstock, Ruth ;
Lettice, Fiona ;
Oezbilgin, Mustafa F. ;
Tatli, Ahu .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (06) :557-574