Economic and environmental impacts of the recycling system in Portugal

被引:34
作者
Ferreira, S. [1 ]
Cabral, M. [1 ]
da Cruz, N. F. [2 ]
Marques, R. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] ULisboa, CEG IST, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] ULisboa, IST, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] ULisboa, IST, CESUR, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Costs and benefits; Environmental valuation; Municipal waste; Packaging waste; Recycling; WASTE MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PACKAGING WASTE; RECOVERY; COSTS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste led to new major investments in infrastructure and equipment for waste management in Portugal to cope with the imposed recycling and recovery targets. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the economic rate of return of the enhanced environmental protection achieved with the implementation of the recycling scheme. Therefore, we calculated, compared, and contrasted all economic and environmental costs and benefits involved in the Portuguese packaging waste recycling system. The economic-financial and environmental assessments were developed based on data collected from the operators in charge of the municipal waste management operations. The same system boundary was used in both assessments. The environmental impacts were quantified through a Life Cycle Assessment and, then, converted into monetary values by means of three environmental valuation methods: Ecovalue08, Eco-costs2012 and Stepwise2006. We concluded that, globally, the benefits surpassed the costs for the three valuation methods. The overall cost coverage ranges between 137% and 196% if the "avoided costs" component is considered. In fact, the refuse collection and waste disposal operations proved to be more costly (mainly in the environmental perspective) than the activities which prepare waste for recycling. The "avoided costs" component assumes an important role in promoting the efficiency of the Portuguese waste management operators (local authorities), reducing their economic costs and also the environmental damage. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Ahlroth S., 2009, TRITAINFRAFMS2001 RO
  • [2] Ecovalue08-A new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools
    Ahlroth, Sofia
    Finnveden, Goran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (17-18) : 1994 - 2003
  • [3] [Anonymous], EC DAT V2
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, EC CLIMATE CHANGE ST, DOI DOI 10.1378/CHEST.128.5
  • [5] [Anonymous], 16536126 TRITASOMISS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, ECONOMICS
  • [7] [Anonymous], BETA METH V2 07
  • [8] APA, 2011, RES URB 2010
  • [9] APA, 2012, PORT NAT INV R UNPUB
  • [10] The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion
    Assamoi, Bernadette
    Lawryshyn, Yuri
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) : 1019 - 1030