Effect of hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions on the potency of ß-alanine analogs of G-protein coupled glucagon receptor inhibitors

被引:15
|
作者
Venugopal, Pushyaraga P. [1 ]
Das, Bratin K. [1 ]
Soorya, E. [1 ]
Chakraborty, Debashree [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Kamataka, Dept Chem, Biophys & Computat Chem Lab, Mangalore, India
关键词
3D-QSAR; density functional calculation; G-protein coupled glucagon receptors; molecular docking; molecular dynamics simulation; beta-alanine analogs; MOLECULAR-MECHANICS; TEST SETS; ANTAGONISTS; ALGORITHM; DOCKING; SOLUBILITY; PARAMETERS; DESIGN; MODEL; FIELD;
D O I
10.1002/prot.25807
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
G-protein coupled glucagon receptors (GCGRs) play an important role in glucose homeostasis and pathophysiology of Type-II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The allosteric pocket located at the trans-membrane domain of GCGR consists of hydrophobic (TM5) and hydrophilic (TM7) units. Hydrophobic interactions with the amino acid residues present at TM5, found to facilitate the favorable orientation of antagonist at GCGR allosteric pocket. A statistically robust and highly predictive 3D-QSAR model was developed using 58 beta-alanine based GCGR antagonists with significant variation in structure and potency profile. The correlation coefficient (R-2) and cross-validation coefficient (Q(2)) of the developed model were found to be 0.9981 and 0.8253, respectively at the PLS factor of 8. The analysis of the favorable and unfavorable contribution of different structural features on the glucagon receptor antagonists was done by 3D-QSAR contour plots. Hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions are found to be main dominating non-bonding interactions in docking studies. Presence of highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in the polar part and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) in the hydrophobic part of antagonists leads to favorable protein-ligand interactions. Molecular mechanics/generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) calculations showed that van der Waals and nonpolar solvation energy terms are crucial components for thermodynamically stable binding of the inhibitors. The binding free energy of highly potent compound was found to be -63.475 kcal/mol; whereas the least active compound exhibited binding energy of -41.097 kcal/mol. Further, five 100 ns molecular dynamics simulation (MD) simulations were done to confirm the stability of the inhibitor-receptor complex. Outcomes of the present study can serve as the basis for designing improved GCGR antagonists.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 344
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biophysical characterization of interactions between the G-protein coupled receptor APJ and a fluorescently tagged apelin analogue in micellar media
    Ngweniform, Pascaline
    Rainey, J. K.
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY-BIOCHIMIE ET BIOLOGIE CELLULAIRE, 2011, 89 (02): : 279 - 279
  • [32] Do G-protein coupled estrogen receptor and bisphenol A analogs influence on Leydig cell epigenetic regulation in immature boar testis ex vivo?
    Pawlicki, P.
    Duliban, M.
    Tuz, R.
    Ptak, A.
    Milon, A.
    Gorowska-Wojtowicz, E.
    Tworzydlo, W.
    Plachno, B. J.
    Bilinska, B.
    Knapczyk-Stwora, K.
    Kotula-Balak, M.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2019, 207 : 21 - 35
  • [33] Structural Determinants Influencing the Potency and Selectivity of Indazole-Paroxetine Hybrid G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors
    Bouley, Renee
    Waldschmidt, Helen V.
    Cato, M. Claire
    Cannavo, Alessandro
    Song, Jianliang
    Cheung, Joseph Y.
    Yao, Xin-Qiu
    Koch, Walter J.
    Larsen, Scott D.
    Tesmer, John J. G.
    MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 92 (06) : 707 - 717
  • [34] Neuroprotective effect of CCL5 via the G-protein coupled receptor 75 (GPR57) activation
    Dedoni, S.
    Avdoshina, V
    Campbell, L. A.
    Rozzi, S. J.
    Mocchetti, I
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNE PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 9 (01) : 13 - 13
  • [35] The effect of deletion of the orphan G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) gene MrgE on pain-like behaviours in mice
    Cox, Peter J.
    Pitcher, Tom
    Trim, Steven A.
    Bell, Christine H.
    Qin, Wenning
    Kinloch, Ross A.
    MOLECULAR PAIN, 2008, 4
  • [36] Structural Mapping and Functional Characterization of Zebrafish Class B G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR) with Dual Ligand Selectivity towards GLP-1 and Glucagon
    Oren, Deena A.
    Wei, Yang
    Skrabanek, Luce
    Chow, Billy K. C.
    Mommsen, Thomas
    Mojsov, Svetlana
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [37] Molecular dynamics simulations and structure-based network analysis reveal structural and functional aspects of G-protein coupled receptor dimer interactions
    Baltoumas, Fotis A.
    Theodoropoulou, Margarita C.
    Hamodrakas, Stavros J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (06) : 489 - 512
  • [38] Molecular dynamics simulations and structure-based network analysis reveal structural and functional aspects of G-protein coupled receptor dimer interactions
    Fotis A. Baltoumas
    Margarita C. Theodoropoulou
    Stavros J. Hamodrakas
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 489 - 512
  • [39] Suppression of the morphine-induced rewarding effect and G-protein activation in the lower midbrain following nerve injury in the mouse: Involvement of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2
    Ozaki, S
    Narita, M
    Narita, M
    Iino, M
    Miyoshi, K
    Suzuki, T
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 116 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [40] The Effect of Allosteric Modulators on the Kinetics of Agonist-G Protein-Coupled Receptor Interactions in Single Living Cells
    May, Lauren T.
    Self, Tim J.
    Briddon, Stephen J.
    Hill, Stephen J.
    MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 78 (03) : 511 - 523