Outcomes With Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Sirolimus After Renal Transplantation in the Context of Steroid Withdrawal or Steroid Continuation

被引:11
作者
Egbuna, Ogo I. [1 ]
Davis, Roger B. [2 ]
Chudinski, Robyn [1 ]
Pavlakis, Martha [1 ]
Rogers, Christin [1 ]
Molakatalla, Phani [1 ]
Johnson, Scott R. [1 ]
Karp, Seth [1 ]
Monaco, Anthony P. [1 ]
Tang, Hongying [1 ]
Hanto, Douglas W. [1 ]
Mandelbrot, Didier A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Transplant Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Sirolimus; Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity; Graft function; CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT NEPHROPATHY; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; GRAFT FUNCTION; OPEN-LABEL; LONG-TERM; RECIPIENTS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; CYCLOSPORINE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b27d44
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A number of studies have suggested that conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) can improve graft function in renal transplant patients. None of these studies has converted patients to SRL in the absence of steroids. Methods. We describe our experience with 278 renal transplants of which 153 were converted from CNI to SRL. The majority of patients had steroids withdrawn after 6 days. Almost all patients received antithymocyte globulin induction and were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil. Results. Six months after conversion, patients remaining on SRL therapy had a mean increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate of 6.93 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p<0.0001) compared with preconversion values. SRL-converted patients analyzed by intention-to-treat increased estimated glomerular filtration rate by 5.00 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P=0.0005). Eighty-one percent of patients remaining on SRL had a successful conversion, defined as stable or improved renal function at 6 months. The only factor predictive of unsuccessful conversion was urine protein-to-creatinine ratio more than 1. The benefits of SRL conversion were seen in patients at high immunological risk as well as those at lower risk. Proteinuria increased by a mean of 0.1 (P=0.43) at 6 months. Thirty-six percent of SRL-converted patients experienced adverse effects requiring conversion back to CNI. Rates of rejection, graft loss, and patient death with SRL conversion were low. Conclusions. The results from our clinical practice suggest that even in the absence of steroids, SRL conversion significantly improves renal function, with acceptable rates of adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 692
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Conversion to sirolimus from cyclosporine may induce nephrotic proteinuria and progressive deterioration of renal function in chronic allograft nephropathy patients [J].
Boratynska, M ;
Banasik, M ;
Watorek, E ;
Falkiewicz, K ;
Patrzalek, D ;
Szyber, P ;
Klinger, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (01) :101-104
[2]   Sirolimus versus cyclosporine in kidney recipients receiving Thymoglobulin®, mycophenolate mofetil and a 6-month course of steroids [J].
Buechler, M. ;
Caillard, S. ;
Barbier, S. ;
Thervet, E. ;
Toupance, O. ;
Mazouz, H. ;
de Ligny, B. Hurault ;
Le Meur, Y. ;
Thierry, A. ;
Villemain, F. ;
Heng, A.-E. ;
Moulin, B. ;
Morin, M. P. ;
Noel, C. ;
Lebranchu, Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (11) :2522-2531
[3]   Long-term results in renal transplant patients with allograft dysfunction after switching from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus [J].
Bumbea, V ;
Kamar, N ;
Ribes, D ;
Esposito, L ;
Modesto, A ;
Guitard, J ;
Nasou, G ;
Durand, D ;
Rostaing, L .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (11) :2517-2523
[4]   Clobetasol ameliorates aphthous ulceration in renal transplant patients on sirolimus [J].
Chuang, P. ;
Langone, A. J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :714-717
[5]  
Davies DR, 2000, TRANSPLANTATION, V69, pSS11
[6]   Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: A prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus [J].
Dean, PG ;
Lund, WJ ;
Larson, TS ;
Prieto, M ;
Nyberg, SL ;
Ishitani, MB ;
Kremers, WK ;
Stegall, MD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (10) :1555-1561
[7]   Predictors of success in conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in chronic allograft dysfunction [J].
Diekmann, F ;
Budde, K ;
Oppenheimer, F ;
Fritsche, L ;
Neumayer, HH ;
Campistol, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1869-1875
[8]   Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation [J].
Ekberg, Henrik ;
Tedesco-Silva, Helio ;
Demirbas, Alper ;
Vitko, Stefan ;
Nashan, Bjorn ;
Guerkan, Alp ;
Margreiter, Raimund ;
Hugo, Christian ;
Grinyo, Josep M. ;
Frei, Ulrich ;
Vanrenterghem, Yves ;
Daloze, Pierre ;
Halloran, Philip F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (25) :2562-2575
[9]   De novo kidney transplantation without use of calcineurin inhibitors preserves renal structure and function at two years [J].
Flechner, SM ;
Kurian, SM ;
Solez, K ;
Cook, DJ ;
Burke, JT ;
Rollin, H ;
Hammond, JA ;
Whisenant, T ;
Lanigan, CM ;
Head, SR ;
Salomon, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1776-1785
[10]   Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs [J].
Flechner, Stuart M. ;
Goldfarb, David ;
Solez, Kim ;
Modlin, Charles S. ;
Mastroianni, Barbara ;
Savas, Kathy ;
Babineau, Denise ;
Kurian, Sunil ;
Salomon, Daniel ;
Novick, Andrew C. ;
Cook, Daniel J. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (07) :883-892