Public perceptions of networked infrastructure

被引:10
作者
Roelich, Katy [1 ]
Litman-Roventa, Nina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Sch Earth & Environm, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Energy Impact Partners, Cologne, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Public perceptions; public participation; public engagement; deliberation; infrastructure; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; ENERGY; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; POLITICS; SCIENCE; POLICY; GOVERNANCE; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/13549839.2020.1845131
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Infrastructure is crucial to the functioning of society and the economy. Yet, to avoid precipitating environmental breakdown, it must undergo transformation. We argue that citizens who rely on infrastructure's services should have a say in how transformation is managed. However, the complex nature of infrastructure means that public dialogue is difficult and rarely done well. Infrastructure has several characteristics, which make elicitation of perceptions challenging: it is connective, relational, obdurate, collective and subject to fragmented governance. We held a series of deliberative workshops in a city in the UK, to examine how public perceptions of infrastructure are shaped by these characteristics. We found that using infrastructure's characteristics as a framework for deliberation built participants' capabilities to articulate perceptions of infrastructure. We argue that using these characteristics also placed more emphasis on the socio-materiality of infrastructure and can address the disconnect between scales of participation and scales of decision making. This offers an alternative way to debate the desirable attributes of infrastructure, which we argue is more productive and inclusive.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 890
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, National Infrastructure Assessment
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, SUSTAINABLE PARTICIP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SELECTIVE REV ACAD N
[4]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[5]   The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses [J].
Bell, D ;
Gray, T ;
Haggett, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2005, 14 (04) :460-477
[6]   Coming of age? Environmental Politics at 21 [J].
Bell, Derek .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 22 (01) :1-15
[7]   Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineering [J].
Bellamy, Rob ;
Chilvers, Jason ;
Vaughan, Naomi E. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2016, 25 (03) :269-286
[8]   Object-ions: From technological determinism towards geographies of relations [J].
Bingham, N .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 1996, 14 (06) :635-657
[9]  
Birch K., 2017, CRIT STUD INNOV, V34, P191
[10]   A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use [J].
Brand-Correa, Lina I. ;
Steinberger, Julia K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 141 :43-52