Does Hangover Influence the Time to Next Drink? An Investigation Using EcologicalMomentary Assessment

被引:35
作者
Epler, Amee J. [1 ,2 ]
Tomko, Rachel L. [1 ,2 ]
Piasecki, Thomas M. [1 ,2 ]
Wood, Phillip K. [1 ,2 ]
Sher, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Shiffman, Saul [3 ]
Heath, Andrew C. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Midwest Alcoholism Res Ctr, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Midwest Alcoholism Res Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Hangover; Alcohol; Punishment; Negative Reinforcement; Ecological Momentary Assessment; ALCOHOL-USE DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS SCALE; RISK; DEHYDROGENASE; PERSONALITY; SENSITIVITY; PREVALENCE; DEPENDENCE; FREQUENCY; ABUSE;
D O I
10.1111/acer.12386
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMeasures of hangover are associated with current and future problematic alcohol use. At present, it is not known whether these associations reflect any direct influence of hangover events on near-term drinking behaviors. The current study aimed to determine whether hangover following a drinking episode influences time to next drink (TTND) and, if so, to determine the direction of this effect and identify any moderating personal or contextual factors. MethodsCommunity-recruited, frequent drinkers oversampled for current smoking (N=386) carried electronic diaries for 21days, reporting on drinking behaviors and other experiences. Survival analysis was used to model data from 2,276 drinking episodes, including 463 episodes that were followed by self-reported hangover in morning diary entries. ResultsWhen tested as the sole predictor in a survival model, hangover was associated with increased TTND. The median survival time was approximately 6hours longer after episodes with hangovers compared to those without. In a multivariate model, hangover was only significant in the presence of interaction effects involving craving at the end of the index drinking episode and the occurrence of financial stressors. Additional predictors of TTND in the final multivariate model included age, lifetime alcohol use disorder diagnosis, typical drinking frequency, day of the week, and morning reports of craving, negative affect, and stressors after the index episode. There was no association between morning reports of hangover and contemporaneous diary ratings of likelihood of drinking later the same day. ConclusionsThe findings suggest that hangover has, at best, a modest or inconsistent influence on the timing of subsequent alcohol use among frequent drinkers.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1469
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   COMPUTERIZED ADMINISTRATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW SCHEDULE [J].
BLOUIN, AG ;
PEREZ, EL ;
BLOUIN, JH .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1988, 23 (03) :335-344
[2]  
Cooper M.L., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V5, P117, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117
[3]   USING ADAPTED SHORT MASTS FOR ASSESSING PARENTAL ALCOHOLISM - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY [J].
CREWS, TM ;
SHER, KJ .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1992, 16 (03) :576-584
[4]   HANGOVER MODERATES THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND DRINKING PROBLEMS [J].
EARLEYWINE, M .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1993, 18 (03) :291-297
[5]   PERSONALITY RISK FOR ALCOHOLISM COVARIES WITH HANGOVER SYMPTOMS [J].
EARLEYWINE, M .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1993, 18 (04) :415-420
[6]   The day after drinking: interaction during hangovers among young Norwegian adults [J].
Fjaer, Eivind Grip .
JOURNAL OF YOUTH STUDIES, 2012, 15 (08) :995-1010
[7]   The 12-month prevalence and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1991-1992 and 2001-2002 [J].
Grant, BF ;
Dawson, DA ;
Stinson, FS ;
Chou, SP ;
Dufour, MC ;
Pickering, RP .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2004, 74 (03) :223-234
[8]  
Greeley J., 1999, PSYCHOL THEORIES DRI, P14
[9]  
HEATHERTON TF, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1119
[10]   Impulsivity and alcohol consumption in young social drinkers [J].
Henges, Amy L. ;
Marczinski, Cecile A. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2012, 37 (02) :217-220