Restraints in daily care for people with moderate intellectual disabilities

被引:8
作者
Van der Meulen, Anne Pier S. [1 ]
Hermsen, Maaike A. [1 ]
Embregts, Petri J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Ethics; intellectual disabilities; morality; restraints on freedom; support staff; STAFF; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/0969733016638141
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Self-determination is an important factor in improving the quality of life of people with moderate intellectual disabilities. A focus on self-determination implies that restraints on the freedom of people with intellectual disabilities should be decreased. In addition, according to the Dutch Care and Coercion bill, regular restraints of freedom, such as restrictions on choice of food or whom to visit, should be discouraged. Such restraints are only allowed if there is the threat of serious harm for the clients or their surroundings. Research question: What do support staff consider as restraints on freedom and how do they justify these restraints? Research design: In this study, data were collected by semi-structured interviews. Participants and research context: Fifteen support staff working with clients with moderate intellectual disabilities were interviewed. All participants work within the same organisation for people with intellectual disabilities in the Eastern part of the Netherlands. Ethical considerations: The study was conducted according to good scientific inquiry guidelines and ethical approval was obtained from a university ethics committee. Findings: Most restraints of freedom were found to be centred around the basic elements in the life of the client, such as eating, drinking and sleeping. In justifying these restraints, support staff said that it was necessary to give clarity in what clients are supposed to do, to structure their life and to keep them from danger. Discussion: In the justification of restraints of freedom two ethical viewpoints, a principle-guided approach and an ethics of care approach, are opposing one other. Here, the self-determination theory can be helpful, while it combines the autonomy of the client, relatedness to others and the client's competence. Conclusion: Despite the reasonable grounds support staff gave for restraining, it raises the question whether restraints of freedom are always in the interest of the client.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 68
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] People with intellectual disabilities and dysphagia
    Robertson, Janet
    Chadwick, Darren
    Baines, Susannah
    Emerson, Eric
    Hatton, Chris
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (11) : 1345 - 1360
  • [22] Interpersonal Sources of Conflict in Young People with and without Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities at Transition from Adolescence to Adulthood
    Larkin, P.
    Jahoda, A.
    MacMahon, K.
    Pert, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 25 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [23] People with intellectual and multiple disabilities as a vulnerable population group in health care
    Hasseler, M.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2014, 139 (40) : 2030 - 2034
  • [24] Mental health and social care needs of older people with intellectual disabilities
    Strydom, A
    Hassiotis, A
    Livingston, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2005, 18 (03) : 229 - 235
  • [25] Inclusive nursing care for people with intellectual disabilities using urology services
    Barr, Owen
    Sowney, Margaret
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING, 2007, 1 (03) : 138 - 145
  • [26] The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care
    Niemeijer, Alistair R.
    Depla, Marja F. I. A.
    Frederiks, Brenda J. M.
    Hertogh, Cees M. P. M.
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (03) : 307 - 320
  • [28] Palliative care needs of direct care workers caring for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities
    Gray, Jennifer A.
    Kim, Jinsook
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2020, 48 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [29] Causes of and Alternatives to Medication for Behaviours That Challenge in People with Intellectual Disabilities: Direct Care Providers' Perspectives
    Deb, Shoumitro
    Limbu, Bharati
    Unwin, Gemma L.
    Weaver, Tim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (16)
  • [30] The misdiagnosis of epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
    Chapman, Melanie
    Iddon, Pam
    Atkinson, Kathy
    Brodie, Colin
    Mitchell, Duncan
    Parvin, Garry
    Willis, Steve
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2011, 20 (02): : 101 - 106