FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA AND MULTI-EXPERTS EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT INVESTMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE CASE OF TURKEY

被引:20
作者
Kahraman, Cengiz [1 ]
Suder, Asli [1 ]
Cebi, Selcuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34367 Macka, Turkey
关键词
fuzzy; multi-criteria; multi-expert; government investment; higher education; AHP; TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; SELECTION; AHP; TOPSIS; OIL;
D O I
10.3846/20294913.2013.837110
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Higher education refers to a level of education that is provided at academies, universities, colleges, seminaries, institutes of technology, and certain other collegiate-level institutions. Government investment policy should be concerned with the marginal rate of return when deciding on whether to increase their expenditure on higher education. Government investment in higher education is a decision making problem, which includes multiple and conflicting criteria. We use fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to take these criteria into account and to handle vague and incomplete data. We also use fuzzy TOPSIS to compare the results of AHP. A case study for Turkey is realized. In this case study, our multi-criteria decision model evaluates three possible higher education investment alternatives. A sensitivity analysis based on different scenarios of experts' preferences is also given.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 569
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   Fuzzy risk assessment of oil and gas offshore wells [J].
Lavasani, S. M. Miri ;
Yang, Z. ;
Finlay, J. ;
Wang, J. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, 89 (05) :277-294
[22]   A fuzzy-AHP-based technique for the decision of design feature selection in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game development [J].
Lo, Ying-Fu ;
Wen, Ming-Hui .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) :8685-8693
[23]  
Opricovic S, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V156, P445, DOI [10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1, 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1]
[24]   Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Paksoy, Turan ;
Pehlivan, Nimet Yapici ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) :2822-2841
[25]   Selecting an appropriate excavation construction method based on qualitative assessments [J].
Pan, N. F. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :5481-5490
[26]   Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings [J].
Hsieh, Ting-Ya ;
Lu, Shih-Tong ;
Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung .
International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22 (07) :573-584
[27]   Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J].
Tiryaki, Fatma ;
Ahlatcioglu, Beyza .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2009, 179 (1-2) :53-69
[28]   Measuring social returns to higher education investments in Hong Kong: production function approach [J].
Voon, JP .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2001, 20 (05) :503-510
[29]   FIOWHM operator and its application to multiple attribute group decision making [J].
Wei, Gui-Wu .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :2984-2989
[30]   FUZZY SETS [J].
ZADEH, LA .
INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1965, 8 (03) :338-&