Comparison of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Prediction Models, Based on Hospital Warehouse and Demographic Data

被引:0
作者
Dhalluin, Thibault [1 ]
Bannay, Aurelie [2 ]
Lemordant, Pierre [1 ]
Sylvestre, Emmanuelle [1 ]
Chazard, Emmanuel [3 ]
Cuggia, Marc [1 ]
Bouzille, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, INSERM, CHU Rennes, LTSI UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Lorraine, CHRU Nancy, Serv Evaluat & Informat Med, F-54000 Nancy, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, CERIM EA2694, F-59000 Lille, France
来源
DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE | 2020年 / 270卷
关键词
Medical Informatics; Data Warehousing; Supervised Machine Learning; Patient Readmission/statistics and numerical data; EVENTS; RISK;
D O I
10.3233/SHTI200220
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Anticipating unplanned hospital readmission episodes is a safety and medico-economic issue. We compared statistics (Logistic Regression) and machine learning algorithms (Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Neural Network) for predicting the risk of all-cause, 30-day hospital readmission using data from the clinical data warehouse of Rennes and from other sources. The dataset included hospital stays based on the criteria of the French national methodology for the 30-day readmission rate (i.e., patients older than 18 years, geolocation, no iterative stays, and no hospitalization for palliative care), with a similar pre-processing for all algorithms. We calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for 30-day readmission prediction by each model. In total, we included 259114 hospital stays, with a readmission rate of 8.8%. The AUC was 0.61 for the Logistic Regression, 0.69 for the Gradient Boosting, 0.69 for the Random Forest, and 0.62 for the Neural Network model. We obtained the best performance and reproducibility to predict readmissions with Random Forest, and found that the algorithms performed better when data came from different sources.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 551
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Predictive models for hospital readmission risk: A systematic review of methods
    Artetxe, Arkaitz
    Beristain, Andoni
    Grana, Manuel
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 164 : 49 - 64
  • [2] Baltimore S.B., 2019, READM RED PROGR
  • [3] An Integrated Workflow For Secondary Use of Patient Data for Clinical Research
    Bouzille, Guillaume
    Sylvestre, Emmanuelle
    Campillo-Gimenez, Boris
    Renault, Eric
    Ledieu, Thibault
    Delamarre, Denis
    Cuggia, Marc
    [J]. MEDINFO 2015: EHEALTH-ENABLED HEALTH, 2015, 216 : 913 - 913
  • [4] DGOS, 2019, IND REH COORD
  • [5] The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital
    Forster, AJ
    Murff, HJ
    Peterson, JF
    Gandhi, TK
    Bates, DW
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (03) : 161 - 167
  • [6] Garson GD., 1991, AI EXPERT, V6, P46, DOI DOI 10.5555/129449.129452
  • [7] A Comparative Analysis of Hospital Readmissions in France and the US
    Gusmano, Michael
    Rodwin, Victor G.
    Weisz, Daniel
    Cottenet, Jonathan
    Quantin, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2016, 18 (02): : 195 - 209
  • [8] Rehospitalizations among Patients in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Program
    Jencks, Stephen F.
    Williams, Mark V.
    Coleman, Eric A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (14) : 1418 - 1428
  • [9] Risk Prediction Models for Hospital Readmission A Systematic Review
    Kansagara, Devan
    Englander, Honora
    Salanitro, Amanda
    Kagen, David
    Theobald, Cecelia
    Freeman, Michele
    Kripalani, Sunil
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (15): : 1688 - 1698
  • [10] A roadmap for comparing readmission policies with application to Denmark, England, Germany and the United States
    Kristensen, Soren Rud
    Bech, Mickael
    Quentin, Wilm
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (03) : 264 - 273