Experimental Research on Behaviour of 3D Printed Gripper Soft Jaws

被引:0
作者
Chitariu, Dragos-Florin [1 ]
Paduraru, Emilian [1 ]
Dogan, Gures [1 ]
Ilhan, Mehmet [1 ]
Negoescu, Florin [1 ]
Dumitras, Catalin-Gabriel [1 ]
Beznea, Adrian [2 ]
Stefanescu, Victorita [2 ]
Constantin, Iulian [2 ]
Berbece, Sorin [2 ]
Horodinca, Mihaita [1 ]
机构
[1] Gheorghe Asachi Tech Univ Iasi, Dept Machine Machine Tool & Tools, 59A Prof Drdoc D Mangeron Str, Iasi 700050, Romania
[2] Dunarea de Jos Univ Galati, Med & Pharm Fac, 47 Domneasta Str, Galati 800008, Romania
关键词
gripper jaws; 3D printing; Experimental tests;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, the problem of the behaviour of soft jaws that can be used to replace the steel jaws of grippers is studied. One of the advantages of additive manufacturing is the printing of fully functional parts. Choice of material is often related to the part strength. The mechanical properties of 3D printed parts should meet the service loading and, also, must be comparable with parts produced by traditional manufacturing techniques - machined parts or injection moulding. From the specialized literature information regarding the test results for effect of various printing parameters on part strength are available made in laboratory conditions and for standard test sample. For ABS materials various values for Young module are presented varying from 1.5 GPa to 2.15 GPa, for 100% infill rate and various modified parameters such as raster orientation. In order to study the behaviour of soft gripper jaws several part were printing and the resistance to bending was tested, by simulating the way a gripper works. An experimental stand was built using a force transducer and a displacement transducer to measure the deformation of the jaw, obtained by 3D printing, under load. The mechanical elastic hysteresis loop during an experimental loading/unloading was plotted and the amount of mechanical energy lost during a cycle, dissipated because the internal friction, was determined. Finite element analysis method was applied to make a comparison with the experimental results. In the finite element analysis, several simulations were considered, varying Young's modulus for the tested material.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 375
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Abeykoon C., 2020, International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJLMM.2020.03.003
[2]  
Ahmed M., 2016, COMP BENDING STIFFNE, DOI [10.1115/imece2016-65119, DOI 10.1115/IMECE2016-65119]
[3]  
Boyes W.E., 1989, Handbook of Jig and Fixture Design
[4]   Research on 3D printed fixture components [J].
Chitariu, Dragos-Florin ;
Munteanu, Adriana .
22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING AND ENERGY - IMANE&E 2018, 2018, 178
[6]   Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations [J].
Huang, Yong ;
Leu, Ming C. ;
Mazumder, Jyoti ;
Donmez, Alkan .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (01)
[7]   Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes [J].
Lim, S. ;
Buswell, R. A. ;
Le, T. T. ;
Austin, S. A. ;
Gibb, A. G. F. ;
Thorpe, T. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 21 :262-268
[8]  
Popescu A, 2018, MATER PLAST, V55, P20
[9]   Design for additive manufacturing: Framework and methodology [J].
Vaneker, Tom ;
Bernard, Alain ;
Moroni, Giovanni ;
Gibson, Ian ;
Zhang, Yicha .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (02) :578-599
[10]   Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS [J].
Wu, Wenzheng ;
Geng, Peng ;
Li, Guiwei ;
Zhao, Di ;
Zhang, Haibo ;
Zhao, Ji .
MATERIALS, 2015, 8 (09) :5834-5846