Citizens' e-participation on agenda setting in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter?

被引:55
作者
Lee, Jooho [1 ]
Kim, Soonhee [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Sch Publ Adm, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[2] KDI Sch Publ Policy & Management, Sejong, South Korea
关键词
e-Participation; agenda setting; social capital; e-participation management; local governance; INTERNET POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; E-GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT; USER ACCEPTANCE; MEDIA USE; TRUST; PERFORMANCE; STATES;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2017.1340507
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Although a growing body of literature has touted e-participation as a means of facilitating greater citizen participation in policy decision-making processes, little is known about the driving forces behind citizens' use of e-participation. Based on a literature review of social capital and citizen participation, this study develops and tests a model proposing that three dimensions of social capital and three dimensions of citizen participation management should be positively associated with e-participation in agenda setting. Using data from a Korean e-participation survey conducted in 2009, we found that citizens tend to be more active e-participants when they have greater trust in government and are weakly tied to offline social groups. We also found that citizen participants' perception of government responsiveness to their input can facilitate their e-participation. The study findings imply that local governments should pay more attention to the function of public trust in local government and provide quality feedback in response to citizen input. They should also be sensitive to how the social factors of e-participants can facilitate involvement in agenda setting.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 895
页数:23
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Andrain C.F., 2006, Political democracy, trust, and social justice
[2]   Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance Evidence from the US States [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Brewer, Gene A. .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 15 (01) :19-42
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Structural Holes
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Making Democracy Work: s. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7-8R7
[6]   Building institutional legitimacy: The role of procedural justice [J].
Baird, VA .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 54 (02) :333-354
[7]   Communicative Capacity: The Added Value of Public Encounters for Participatory Democracy [J].
Bartels, Koen P. R. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 44 (06) :656-674
[8]   Trust and risk in e-government adoption [J].
Belanger, France ;
Carter, Lemuria .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 17 (02) :165-176
[9]   Dealing with cynical citizens [J].
Berman, EM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1997, 57 (02) :105-112
[10]   Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation [J].
Best, SJ ;
Krueger, BS .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 27 (02) :183-216