Seismic behavior of bidirectional-resistant ductile end diaphragms with buckling restrained braces in straight steel bridges

被引:52
作者
Celik, Oguz C. [1 ,2 ]
Bruneau, Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Div Theory Struct, Fac Architecture, TR-34437 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Straight steel bridges; Hysteretic energy dissipation; Ductile end diaphragm; Seismic retrofit; Bidirectional earthquake effects; DECK-TRUSS BRIDGES; GIRDER BRIDGES; PERFORMANCE; RETROFIT; DEMANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.08.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The ductile end diaphragm concept developed for regular (i.e., straight) slab-on-girder or deck-truss steel bridge superstructures is expanded to make it applicable to bidirectional earthquake excitation. Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are used as the ductile fuses. Two retrofit schemes (Retrofit Scheme-1 and Retrofit Scheme-2) are investigated to seek the best geometrical layout to maximize the dissipated hysteretic energy of the ductile diaphragms with BRB end diaphragms. Closed form solutions are presented for practical design purposes. Behavioral characteristics (strength, stiffness, and drift) of the proposed retrofit schemes for end diaphragms are quantified with an emphasis on hysteretic energy dissipation. Results from selected numerical examples show that the generic bridge geometry, bidirectional loading, and the loading ratio (or the assumed combination rule), have a pronounced effect on the end diaphragm's inelastic behavior. Volumetric hysteretic energy dissipation is used to compare the effectiveness of the proposed retrofit schemes under several loading cases. These indicate that, in most cases, Retrofit Scheme-1 is superior to Retrofit Scheme-2 and may exhibit better seismic response. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 393
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Alfawakhiri F, 2000, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V29, P711, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<711::AID-EQE936>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-#
[3]   Local versus global ductility demands in simple bridges [J].
Alfawakhiri, F ;
Bruneau, M .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (05) :554-560
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
[5]  
ATC (Applied Technology Council), 1996, ATC32
[6]  
BLACK C, 2002, 200208 BERK PAC EART
[7]   Displacement-based energy dissipation systems for steel bridges diaphragms [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Sarraf, M ;
Zahrai, SM ;
Alfawakhiri, F .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2002, 58 (5-8) :801-817
[8]   Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Wilson, JC ;
Tremblay, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1996, 23 (03) :678-713
[9]   Seismic performance of steel girder bridges with ductile cross frames using single angle X braces [J].
Carden, LP ;
Itani, AM ;
Buckle, IG .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (03) :329-337
[10]   Seismic performance of steel girder bridges with ductile cross frames using buckling-restrained braces [J].
Carden, LP ;
Itani, AM ;
Buckle, IG .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (03) :338-345