ARE THERE ANY ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BUSINESS R&D SUPPORT? THE CASE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC

被引:7
作者
Ratinger, T. [1 ]
Cadil, V [1 ]
Amoako, Agyemang S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Technol Ctr, Ve Struhach 27, Prague 16000 6, Czech Republic
[2] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 16500 6, Suchdol, Czech Republic
关键词
R&D support; economic impacts; econometric approaches; generalized propensity score matching; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; FIRMS; INNOVATION; SIZE; PERFORMANCE; ENTERPRISES; PROGRAMS; SCHEMES; INPUT;
D O I
10.18267/j.cebr.251
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Evaluation of the economic impact of public research and development (R&D) support has become an integral part of the policymaking process. The paper examines the economic effects of the Czech programme TIP supporting R&D in private companies in the recent decade and aspires to contribute to the debate on quantitative methods for assessing outputs additionality of public R&D programmes. The analysis is based on the counter-factual econometric approach, because an appropriate control group could not be found among the unsupported companies, a so-called generalized propensity score matching (GPSM) was used. Two data sources were used: monitoring data of the programme TIP and economic data from the database Bisnode-MagnusWeb. The impact of R&D support on the firms' performance was measured by output indicators: gross value added, profit and productivity. Treatment effects are diverse depending on firm sizes. Generally, the R&D support effects are positive and more substantial in small and medium firms (SMEs) while there are no such effects confirmed for large firms. The support could only impact positively on the output (profit, productivity and gross value added) of small firms only after reaching a certain minimum threshold of the support whereas output diminishes for medium firms after a point of saturation. Implications for Central European audience: This paper results could be useful for policymakers and R&D funding providers because it provides evidence about the microeconomic impacts of programmes, namely it shows the differentiated effects of public interventions toby the size categories of beneficiaries. The analysis confirms that GPSM approach provides deliver logical outcomes and if the investigation is situated to the right period after the programme is accomplished, it has a potential to bring more insight in the effects than the standard dichotomous model.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 62
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] ACS ZJ, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P678
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, RES INNOVATION POLIC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, HDB IMPACT EVALUATIO
  • [4] Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy
    Audretsch, DB
    Vivarelli, M
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (03) : 249 - 258
  • [5] Retaining winners: Can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship?
    Autio, Erkko
    Rannikko, Heikki
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) : 42 - 55
  • [6] PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Becker, Bettina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) : 917 - 942
  • [7] Assessing the effect of the amount of financial aids to Piedmont firms using the generalized propensity score
    Bia, Michela
    Mattei, Alessandra
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 21 (04) : 485 - 516
  • [8] Bondonio D., 2016, COUNTERFACTUAL IMPAC, DOI [10.2791/240240, DOI 10.2791/240240]
  • [9] The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation
    Bronzini, Raffaello
    Piselli, Paolo
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) : 442 - 457
  • [10] Cadil V., 2018, ZAVERECNE HODNOCENI