The Low Submuscular Reservoir Placement With Transfascial Fixation for Inflatable Penile Prostheses

被引:5
|
作者
Khoei, Amelia [1 ]
Racik, Nikola [2 ]
Bansal, Utsav [2 ]
Flores, Felipe [3 ]
Khera, Mohit [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Sch Med, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Houston Methodist Urol Associates, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Urol, 7200 Cambridge, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2022年 / 19卷 / 08期
关键词
Inflatable Penile Prosthesis; Patient Satisfaction; Surgical Instruments; Surgical Technique; Sexual Satisfaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.05.143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Several techniques have been described for placement of inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) reser-voirs, with variable satisfaction. Standard placement in the Space of Retzius can present with several complica-tions and may be technically difficult in patients with a violated space. Concerns with ectopic reservoir placement have included reservoir herniation and lack of reservoir concealability. Aim: To present a novel technique to achieve reservoir concealment with decreased postoperative complications as an alternative to standard approaches of ectopic reservoir placement. Methods: We describe our novel low submuscular reservoir (LSM) placement with transfascial fixation (TFF) for inflatable penile prostheses. Outcomes: Patient satisfaction with reservoir concealment, complication rate or need for additional surgeries. Results: A total of 31 cases successfully underwent our technique. The low submuscular placement with TFF of the IPP reservoir offers an optimal approach for reservoir placement with a high degree of patient satisfaction with significant ease of placement compared to alternative methods. Clinical Implications: Penile prosthetic surgeons should be familiar with several techniques for concealment of reservoir as an option to improve patient satisfaction. Strengths and Limitations: Given the small sample size of patients who have undergone this novel technique, current literature regarding the topic is limited. Conclusion: Low submuscular reservoir placement with transfascial fixation for IPPs is a technically feasible approach that can be employed to achieve patient satisfaction and decrease the risk of reservoir herniation. Copyright (c) 2022, International Society of Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1312
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] State of the Reservoir: Current Concepts of Penile Implant Reservoir Placement and Potential Complications
    Maia Van Dyke
    Adam S. Baumgarten
    Nicolas Ortiz
    Steven J. Hudak
    Allen F. Morey
    Current Urology Reports, 2021, 22
  • [32] Management of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoir at time of revision surgery: remove, retain, or recycle?
    Amini, Armon D.
    Nealon, Samantha W.
    Badkhshan, Shervin
    Langford, Brian T.
    Matz, Ethan L.
    VanDyke, Maia E.
    Franzen, Bryce P.
    Morey, Allen F.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01): : 170 - 174
  • [33] Editorial Comment on "Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement"
    Alkassis, Marwan
    Raheem, Omer
    UROLOGY, 2024, 193
  • [34] Long-Term Survival Rates of Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Miller, Larry E.
    Khera, Mohit
    Bhattacharyya, Samir
    Patel, Mital
    Nitschelm, Krista
    Burnett, Arthur L.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 6 - 10
  • [35] Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses
    Pagliara, Travis J.
    Smith, Daniel W.
    Viers, Boyd R.
    Morey, Allen F.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 19 (06)
  • [36] Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses
    Travis J. Pagliara
    Daniel W. Smith
    Boyd R. Viers
    Allen F. Morey
    Current Urology Reports, 2018, 19
  • [37] Non-Infectious Reservoir-Related Complications During and After Penile Prosthesis Placement
    Clavell-Hernandez, Jonathan
    Shah, Anuj
    Wang, Run
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [38] Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report
    Trost, L. W.
    Boonjindasup, A. G.
    Hellstrom, W. J. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 27 (03) : 86 - 89
  • [39] Delayed placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis is associated with a high complication rate in men with a history of ischemic priapism
    Barham, David W.
    Chang, Chrystal
    Hammad, Muhammed
    Pyrgidis, Nikolaos
    Swerdloff, Daniel
    Gross, Kelli
    Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios
    Hsieh, Tung-Chin
    Hotaling, James M.
    Jenkins, Lawrence C.
    Jones, James M.
    Modgil, Vaibhav
    Osmonov, Daniar
    Pearce, Ian
    Perito, Paul
    Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein
    Suarez-Sarmiento, Jr Alfredo
    Sempels, Maxime
    Service, C. Austin
    Simhan, Jay
    Yafi, Faysal A.
    Gross, Martin S.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2023, 20 (07): : 1052 - 1056
  • [40] Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis
    Grande, Pietro
    Antonini, Gabriele
    Cristini, Cristiano
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Gatto, Antonio
    Di Lascio, Giovanni
    Lemma, Andrea
    Gentile, Giuseppe
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) : 1167 - 1174