Can Chronic Disease Management Programs for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Reduce Productivity-Related Indirect Costs of the Disease? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:14
作者
Adepoju, Omolola E. [1 ]
Bolin, Jane N. [1 ]
Ohsfeldt, Robert L. [1 ]
Phillips, Charles D. [1 ]
Zhao, Hongwei [2 ]
Ory, Marcia G. [3 ]
Forjuoh, Samuel N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Rural Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Rural Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Rural Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot & Community Hlth Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Scott & White Santa Fe, Dept Family Med, Div Res, Temple, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEALTH; IMPACT; WORK; EMPLOYMENT; EARNINGS; PARTICIPATION; QUALITY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1089/pop.2013.0029
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective was to assess the impacts of diabetes self-management programs on productivity-related indirect costs of the disease. Using an employer's perspective, this study estimated the productivity losses associated with: (1) employee absence on the job, (2) diabetes-related disability, (3) employee presence on the job, and (4) early mortality. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and survey responses of 376 adults aged >= 18 years who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of type 2 diabetes self-management programs. All study participants had uncontrolled diabetes and were randomized into one of 4 study arms: personal digital assistant (PDA), chronic disease self-management program (CDSMP), combined PDA and CDSMP, and usual care (UC). The human-capital approach was used to estimate lost productivity resulting from 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, which are summed to obtain total productivity loss. Using robust regression, total productivity loss was modeled as a function of the diabetes self-management programs and other identified demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to subjects in the UC arm, there were no statistically significant differences in productivity losses among persons undergoing any of the 3 diabetes management interventions. Males were associated with higher productivity losses (+$708/year; P < 0.001) and persons with greater than high school education were associated with additional productivity losses (+$758/year; P < 0.001). Persons with more than 1 comorbid condition were marginally associated with lower productivity losses (-$326/year; P = 0.055). No evidence was found that the chronic disease management programs examined in this trial affect indirect productivity losses.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Adepoju O, PAT ED COUN IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], US LIFE TABLES
  • [3] An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates
    Antecol, H
    [J]. LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2000, 7 (04) : 409 - 426
  • [4] Working for less? Women's part-time wage penalties across countries
    Bardasi, Elena
    Gornick, Janet C.
    [J]. FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2008, 14 (01) : 37 - 72
  • [5] The impact of diabetes on adult employment and earnings of Mexican Americans:: Findings from a community based study
    Bastida, E
    Pagán, JA
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (05) : 403 - 413
  • [6] Alternative valuations of work loss and productivity
    Berger, ML
    Murray, JF
    Xu, J
    Pauly, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 43 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [7] Importing equality? The impact of globalization on gender discrimination
    Black, SE
    Brainerd, E
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2004, 57 (04): : 540 - 559
  • [8] Gender differences in pay
    Blau, FD
    Kahn, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 14 (04) : 75 - 99
  • [9] Bolin J., 2002, DIS DISABILITY IMPOR
  • [10] Productivity Costs of Cancer Mortality in the United States: 2000-2020
    Bradley, Cathy J.
    Yabroff, K. Robin
    Dahman, Bassam
    Feuer, Eric J.
    Mariotto, Angela
    Brown, Martin L.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (24): : 1763 - 1770