The link between economic and environmental performance of the top 10 US ports

被引：37

作者：

Cheon, SangHyun ^{[1
]}

Maltz, Arnold ^{[2
]}

Dooley, Kevin ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Hongik Univ, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Seoul, South Korea

[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA

[3] Arizona State Univ, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Inst Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA

来源：

MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 44卷 / 02期

基金：

新加坡国家研究基金会;

关键词：

Sustainability; port pollution; environmental performance; resource-based view of firms; bootstrap DEA; undesirable DEA; kernel density estimation; MODELING UNDESIRABLE FACTORS; CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;

D O I：

10.1080/03088839.2016.1275860

中图分类号：

U [交通运输];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0823 ;

摘要：

Ports currently face increasing demands to address a variety of environmental issues and achieve sustainability objectives. Using insights from the resource-based view of firms, this study examines the link between economic performance (EP) and environmental performance (ENP) of the top 10 U.S. seaports. Geospatial modeling is used to capture pollution incidents that can be geographically dispersed; in addition, both a bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach and an undesirable DEA model are used to measure port ENP and EP. Our findings are in general consistent with assertions that positive EP can be attained in conjunction with good environmental practices. Ports' capabilities of strategic capital investment in physical assets, collaborative interorganizational processes, and performance monitoring are essential, while they pursue both economic and environmental goals simultaneously.

引用

页码：227 / 247

页数：21

共 59 条

[1] Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations [J].

Andersson, LM ;

Bateman, TS .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :548-570

[2]

[Anonymous], 1998, DENSITY ESTIMATION S, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315140919

[3]

Bailey D., 2004, Harboring Pollution: Strategies to Clean Up U.S. Ports

[4] Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].

Barnett, Michael L. ;

Salomon, Robert M. .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122

[5] FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].

BARNEY, J .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120

[6] Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].

Berman, SL ;

Wicks, AC ;

Kotha, S ;

Jones, TM .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506

[7] DOES IT PAY TO BE DIFFERENT? AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].

Brammer, Stephen ;

Millington, Andrew .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (12) :1325-1343

[8] Measuring Corporate Social Performance: An Efficiency Perspective [J].

Chen, Chien-Ming ;

Delmas, Magali .

PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 20 (06) :789-804

[9] The Economic-Social Performance Relationships of Ports: Roles of Stakeholders and Organizational Tension [J].

Cheon, SangHyun .

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 25 (01) :50-62

[10] Supply Chain Coordination for Port Sustainability Lessons for New Institutional Designs [J].

Cheon, SangHyun ;

Deakin, Elizabeth .

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2166) :10-19

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →