Learning from mixed OR method practice: The NINES case study

被引:10
作者
Howick, Susan [1 ]
Ackermann, Fran [2 ]
Walls, Lesley [1 ]
Quigley, John [1 ]
Houghton, Tom [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Curtin Univ, Curtin Business Sch, Sch Management, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin Grad Sch Business, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 69卷
关键词
Mixed methods; Causal mapping; Decision tree; Evaluation; Case study; Risk analysis; MULTIMETHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; HARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 81
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]  
Flood R.L., 1991, CREATIVE PROBLEM SOL
[22]   Understanding multi-methodology: Evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions [J].
Franco, L. Alberto ;
Lord, Ewan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (03) :362-372
[23]   Unpacking multimethodology: Impacts of a community development intervention [J].
Henao, Felipe ;
Franco, L. Alberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 253 (03) :681-696
[24]   Supporting strategic conversations: the significance of a quantitative model building process [J].
Howick, S. ;
Eden, C. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2011, 62 (05) :868-878
[25]   Building confidence in models for multiple audiences: The modelling cascade [J].
Howick, Susan ;
Eden, Colin ;
Ackermann, Fran ;
Williams, Terry .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 186 (03) :1068-1083
[26]   Mixing OR methods in practice: Past, present and future directions [J].
Howick, Susan ;
Ackermann, Fran .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 215 (03) :503-511
[27]   FROM MANY TO ONE, AND BACK - AN EXPLORATION OF SOME COMPONENTS OF FACILITATION [J].
HUXHAM, C ;
CROPPER, S .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 22 (01) :1-11
[28]  
Jackson MC, 1999, J OPER RES SOC, V50, P12, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600661
[29]   Combining PSMs with hard OR methods: the philosophical and practical challenges [J].
Kotiadis, K. ;
Mingers, J. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2006, 57 (07) :856-867
[30]   Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods [J].
Midgley, Gerald ;
Cavana, Robert Y. ;
Brocklesby, John ;
Foote, Jeff L. ;
Wood, David R. R. ;
Ahuriri-Driscoll, Annabel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 229 (01) :143-154