Learning from mixed OR method practice: The NINES case study

被引:10
作者
Howick, Susan [1 ]
Ackermann, Fran [2 ]
Walls, Lesley [1 ]
Quigley, John [1 ]
Houghton, Tom [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, 199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Curtin Univ, Curtin Business Sch, Sch Management, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin Grad Sch Business, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 69卷
关键词
Mixed methods; Causal mapping; Decision tree; Evaluation; Case study; Risk analysis; MULTIMETHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; HARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 81
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Ackermann, 2015, WILEY ENCY IN PRESS
[2]  
Ackermann Fran, 2011, INFORMS Transactions on Education, V12, P55, DOI 10.1287/ited.1110.0071
[3]   Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks [J].
Ackermann, Fran ;
Howick, Susan ;
Quigley, John ;
Walls, Lesley ;
Houghton, Tom .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 238 (01) :290-299
[4]   Problem structuring methods 'in the Dock': Arguing the case for Soft OR [J].
Ackermann, Fran .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 219 (03) :652-658
[5]   ScriptsMap: A tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops [J].
Ackermann, Fran ;
Andersen, David F. ;
Eden, Colin ;
Richardson, George P. .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (04) :427-434
[6]  
Ackermann F, 2010, SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO MANAGING CHANGE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P135, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_4
[7]  
Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-7
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, REL CONS INT SMART G
[10]   Expert elicitation for reliable system design [J].
Bedford, Tim ;
Quigley, John ;
Walls, Lesley .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 21 (04) :428-450