Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Statistical considerations, emission factor calculation, and data reporting

被引:30
作者
de Klein, Cecile A. M. [1 ]
Alfaro, Marta A. [2 ]
Giltrap, Donna [3 ]
Topp, Cairistiona F. E. [4 ]
Simon, Priscila L. [1 ]
Noble, Alasdair D. L. [5 ]
van der Weerden, Tony J. [1 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch, Invermay Agr Ctr, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
[2] INIA, Fidel Oteiza 1956,Piso 12, Santiago, Chile
[3] Maanaki Whenua Landcare Res, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[4] SRUC, West Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] AgResearch, Lincoln Res Ctr, Lincoln, New Zealand
关键词
NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; FERTILIZER; BIAS; QUANTIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; FLUXES; MANURE; URINE; BEEF; CO2;
D O I
10.1002/jeq2.20127
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Static chambers are often used for measuring nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from soils, but statistical analysis of chamber data is challenged by the inherently heterogeneous nature of N2O fluxes. Because N2O chamber measurements are commonly used to assess N2O mitigation strategies or to determine country-specific emission factors (EFs) for calculating national greenhouse gas inventories, it is important that statistical analysis of the data is sound and that EFs are robustly estimated. This paper is one of a series of articles that provide guidance on different aspects of N2O chamber methodologies. Here, we discuss the challenges associated with statistical analysis of heterogeneous data, by summarizing statistical approaches used in recent publications and providing guidance on assessing normality and options for transforming data that follow a non-normal distribution. We also recommend minimum requirements for reporting of experimental and metadata of N2O studies to ensure that the robustness of the results can be reliably evaluated. This includes detailed information on the experimental site, methodology and measurement procedures, gas analysis, data and statistical analyses, and approaches to generate EFs, as well as results of ancillary measurements. The reliability, robustness, and comparability of soil N2O emissions data will be improved through (a) application, and reporting, of more rigorous methodological standards by researchers and (b) greater vigilance by reviewers and scientific editors to ensure that all necessary information is reported in scientific publications.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1167
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Direct Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Tropical And Sub-Tropical Agricultural Systems-A Review And Modelling Of Emission Factors [J].
Albanito, Fabrizio ;
Lebender, Ulrike ;
Cornulier, Thomas ;
Sapkota, Tek B. ;
Brentrup, Frank ;
Stirling, Clare ;
Hillier, Jon .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
[3]   Review and analysis of global agricultural N2O emissions relevant to the UK [J].
Buckingham, S. ;
Anthony, S. ;
Bellamy, P. H. ;
Cardenas, L. M. ;
Higgins, S. ;
McGeough, K. ;
Topp, C. F. E. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 487 :164-172
[4]  
Buendia E.C., 2019, 2019 refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use
[5]   Quantifying annual N2O emission fluxes from grazed grassland under a range of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen inputs [J].
Cardenas, L. M. ;
Thorman, R. ;
Ashleee, N. ;
Butler, M. ;
Chadwick, D. ;
Chambers, B. ;
Cuttle, S. ;
Donovan, N. ;
Kingston, H. ;
Lane, S. ;
Dhanoa, M. S. ;
Scholefield, D. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 136 (3-4) :218-226
[6]   The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories [J].
Chadwick, D. R. ;
Cardenas, L. M. ;
Dhanoa, M. S. ;
Donovan, N. ;
Misselbrook, T. ;
Williams, J. R. ;
Thorman, R. E. ;
McGeough, K. L. ;
Watson, C. J. ;
Bell, M. ;
Anthony, S. G. ;
Rees, R. M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 635 :607-617
[7]   Optimizing chamber methods for measuring nitrous oxide emissions from plot-based agricultural experiments [J].
Chadwick, D. R. ;
Cardenas, L. ;
Misselbrook, T. H. ;
Smith, K. A. ;
Rees, R. M. ;
Watson, C. J. ;
Mcgeough, K. L. ;
Williams, J. R. ;
Cloy, J. M. ;
Thorman, R. E. ;
Dhanoa, M. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2014, 65 (02) :295-307
[8]   Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Recommendations for deployment and accounting for sources of variability [J].
Charteris, Alice F. ;
Chadwick, David R. ;
Thorman, Rachel E. ;
Vallejo, Antonio ;
de Klein, Cecile A. M. ;
Rochette, Philippe ;
Cardenas, Laura M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 49 (05) :1092-1109
[9]   Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Design considerations [J].
Clough, Timothy J. ;
Rochette, Philippe ;
Thomas, Steve M. ;
Pihlatie, Mari ;
Christiansen, Jesper R. ;
Thorman, Rachel E. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2020, 49 (05) :1081-1091
[10]   SOME CONSEQUENCES WHEN THE ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ARE NOT SATISFIED [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1947, 3 (01) :22-38