Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle product: A system dynamics framework

被引:43
作者
Kamath, Narasimha B. [1 ]
Roy, Rahul [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Calcutta, Management Informat Syst Grp, Kolkata 700104, W Bengal, India
关键词
supply chain; capacity planning; system dynamics; feedback loop dominance; forecasting;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.045
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
For an innovative product characterized by short product lifecycle and high demand uncertainty, investment in capacity buildup has to be done cautiously. Otherwise either the product's market diffusion is impeded or the manufacturer is left with unutilized capacity. Using the right information for making capacity augmentation decisions is critical in facing this challenge. In this paper, we propose a method for identifying critical information flows using the system dynamics model of a two-echelon supply chain. The fundamental premise of system dynamics methodology is that (system) structure determines (its) behavior. Using loop dominance analysis method we study the feedback loop structure of the supply chain system. The outcome is a set of dominant loops that determine the dynamics of capacity growth. It is revealed that the delivery delay information has little effect while the loop that connects retail sales with production order affects the dynamics significantly. Modifying this loop yields appropriate capacity augmentation decisions resulting in higher performance. What-if analyses bring out effects of modifying other structural elements. In conclusion, we claim that the information feedback based methodology is general enough to be useful in designing decision support systems for capacity augmentation. The limitations of the model are also discussed and possible extensions identified. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 351
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance [J].
Aviv, Y .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (10) :1326-1343
[2]  
BOTTICELLI P, 1998, INTEL CORPORATION 19
[3]  
BOWEN K, 2002, 9603058 HARV BUS SCH
[4]  
BURGELMAN RA, 2001, AMAZON COM EVOLUTION
[5]   Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information [J].
Chen, F ;
Drezner, Z ;
Ryan, JK ;
Simchi-Levi, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (03) :436-443
[6]  
Coyle RG., 1996, SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODE
[7]   Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach [J].
Dejonckheere, J ;
Disney, SM ;
Lambrecht, MR ;
Towill, DR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (03) :567-590
[8]   Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement [J].
Ernst, R ;
Kamrad, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 124 (03) :495-510
[9]  
FABRIS P, 1998, CIO MAGAZINE AUG, P15
[10]  
Fischer M., 1997, HARVARD BUSINESS MAR, P105