Individual timing of blood counts in G-CSF prophylaxis after myelosuppressive chemotherapy reduces G-CSF injections, blood counts, and costs:: a prospective randomized study in children and adolescents

被引:2
|
作者
Ammann, RA [1 ]
Leibundgut, K [1 ]
Hirt, A [1 ]
Lüthy, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Hematol & Oncol, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
G-CSF; supportive care; myelosuppression; pediatric malignancies; leukemia;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-002-0365-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In children and adolescents, prophylactic application of G-CSF after myelosuppressive chemotherapy reduces the duration of neutropenia, of hospitalization, and of parenteral antibiotic treatment. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and solid tumors, G-CSF support allows dose intensification of chemotherapy. On the other hand, each G-CSF injection causes pain and costs. We set up the hypothesis that besides strategies as restricted indications, delayed start, lower doses, and stringent rules for discontinuation, individualized timing of blood count might optimize G-CSF prophylaxis. We randomized 64 cycles of G-CSF prophylaxis in eight children and adolescents being treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or solid tumors to standard twice a week or to individually timed blood counts. Primary study endpoints were the numbers of G-CSF doses and of blood counts, and the total costs of G-CSF support. Per cycle, individual timing of blood count resulted in a median of one G-CSF injection fewer [estimated population median (EPM) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-2.20] and one blood count fewer (EPM 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.33). The total costs of G-CSF support and of blood counts were thereby reduced by a median of US $ 152 per cycle (EPM 191, 95% CI 97-318). The results of this study suggest that individual timing of blood counts during prophylactic G-CSF support in children and adolescents undergoing chemotherapy for malignant disease can significantly reduce the number of injections and blood counts performed, thus resulting in less pain and lower costs. These findings need confirmation in a larger randomized trial.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 618
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children using G-CSF after carboplatin containing myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Rauck, AM
    Ruymann, FB
    Klopfenstein, K
    Grossman, N
    Rosselet, R
    Grovas, L
    Ceselski, S
    Hayes, J
    Grovas, AC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 1998, 13 (04) : 146 - 154
  • [2] Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy
    G Spitzer
    D Adkins
    M Mathews
    W Velasquez
    C Bowers
    F Dunphy
    N Kronmueller
    R Niemeyer
    W McIntyre
    P Petruska
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1997, 20 : 921 - 930
  • [3] Use of concurrent G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with malignant disease
    L Madero
    M González-Vicent
    J Molina
    R Madero
    V Quintero
    MA Díaz
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2000, 26 : 365 - 369
  • [4] Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting: chemotherapy and G-CSF or GM-CSF
    Siena, S
    Bregni, M
    Gianni, AM
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 1999, 12 (1-2) : 27 - 39
  • [5] Use of concurrent G-CSF plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with malignant disease
    Madero, L
    González-Vicent, M
    Molina, J
    Madero, R
    Quintero, V
    Díaz, MA
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 26 (04) : 365 - 369
  • [6] Delayed Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration after Chemotherapy Reduces Total G-CSF Doses without Affecting Neutrophil Recovery in a Randomized Clinical Study in Children with Solid Tumors
    Yankelevich, Maxim
    Hoogstra, David J.
    Abrams, Judith
    Chu, Roland
    Bhambhani, Kanta
    Taub, Jeffrey W.
    PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 37 (08) : 665 - 675
  • [7] Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF
    J Jansen
    EM Thompson
    S Hanks
    AR Greenspan
    JM Thompson
    MJ Dugan
    LP Akard
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1999, 23 : 1251 - 1256
  • [8] Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF
    Jansen, J
    Thompson, EM
    Hanks, S
    Greenspan, AR
    Thompson, JM
    Dugan, MJ
    Akard, LP
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 23 (12) : 1251 - 1256
  • [9] Randomized comparison of G-CSF+GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy
    Spitzer, G
    Adkins, D
    Mathews, M
    Velasquez, W
    Bowers, C
    Dunphy, F
    Kronmueller, N
    Niemeyer, R
    McIntyre, W
    Petruska, P
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (11) : 921 - 930
  • [10] Delayed G-CSF after autologous progenitor cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial
    Bolwell, BJ
    Pohlman, B
    Andresen, S
    Kalaycio, M
    Goormastic, M
    Wise, K
    Wakeling, A
    Dannley, R
    Overmoyer, B
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 21 (04) : 369 - 373