Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis

被引:12
|
作者
Hungerford, Marc W. [1 ]
Hungerford, David S. [1 ]
Khanuja, Harpal S. [1 ]
Pietryak, Patricia [1 ]
Jones, Lynne C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Orthopaed, Ctr Osteonecrosis Res & Educ, Good Samaritan Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2006年 / 88A卷
关键词
10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; HEAD; REPLACEMENT; MINIMUM; CEMENT;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00777
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent studies have indicated that the rate of successful long-term outcome after primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis may be improved with the use of later-generation porous-coated prostheses (biologic ingrowth fixation) and cement techniques (cement fixation). Less is known about the long-term outcome after revision arthroplasty in the same patient population. The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis. Methods: We evaluated thirty-four osteonecrotic hips in thirty patients who had undergone revision of a femoral component of a prior total hip arthroplasty. There were nineteen men (twenty-two hips) and eleven women (twelve hips) with a mean age of forty-six years. Thirty one of thirty-four hips were implanted without cement. The cementless prostheses were of different stem lengths, but thirty of thirty-one were proximally porous coated. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.2 years. Prerevision radiographs were used to determine the degree of femoral bone loss according to the classification system of Della Valle and Paprosky. The need for revision was analyzed for correlation to known risk factors for osteonecrosis, age and gender of the patient, and degree of prerevision femoral deficiency. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of outcome was performed. Results: This was the first revision for twenty-seven hips, the second for five hips, and the third for two hips. Preoperatively, the defects included four Type I, nine Type II, fifteen Type IIIA, two Type IIIB, one Type IV, and three unknown. The femoral component was rerevised in twelve of the thirty-four hips. One of the failures was the only fully porous-coated stem that was implanted. One of the three cemented implants failed, as compared with eleven of the thirty-one noncemented implants. Survival rates were 90.9% at five years, 54.8% at ten years, 54.8% at fifteen years, and 27.4% at twenty years. With the small sample size, no relationship could be identified with regard to frequency of rerevision and defects, associated risk factors, patient age, or gender. Conclusions: There was a high failure rate of revised, uncemented, proximally coated femoral components in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head at the time of the intermediate-term follow-up. The cause of failure could not be correlated with patient age, gender, risk factors for osteonecrosis, or femoral bone stock. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors on jbjs.org for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 130
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in young patients with osteonecrosis of the hip
    Swarup, Ishaan
    Shields, Marisa
    Mayer, Erik N.
    Hendow, Chelsea J.
    Burket, Jayme C.
    Figgie, Mark P.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) : 286 - 292
  • [42] A Distal Fluted, Proximal Modular Femoral Prosthesis in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    Park, Myung-Sik
    Lee, Ju-Hong
    Park, Jong-Hyuk
    Ham, Dong-Hun
    Rhee, Yang-Keun
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2010, 25 (06): : 932 - 938
  • [43] Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
    Goff, Thomas A. J.
    Bobak, Peter
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) : 281 - 285
  • [44] Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Schofer, M. D.
    Efe, T.
    Heyse, T. J.
    Timmesfeld, N.
    Velte, R.
    Hinrichs, F.
    Schmitt, J.
    ORTHOPADE, 2010, 39 (02): : 209 - +
  • [45] Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants
    Holt, Graeme
    Hook, Samantha
    Hubble, Matthew
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [46] Causes of Revision Hip Arthroplasty After Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
    Tsed, Alexander N.
    Mushtin, Nikita E.
    Dulaev, Alexander K.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2024, 30 (04): : 25 - 37
  • [47] Delay of total hip arthroplasty to advanced stage worsens post-operative hip motion in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis
    Jo, Woo-Lam
    Lee, Young-Kyun
    Ha, Yong-Chan
    Kim, Tae-Young
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (07) : 1599 - 1603
  • [48] Femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification
    Jaenisch, Max
    Kohlhof, Hendrik
    Kasapovic, Adnan
    Gathen, Martin
    Randau, Thomas Martin
    Kabir, Koroush
    Roessler, Philip Peter
    Pagenstert, Geert
    Wirtz, Dieter Christian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (03) : 1163 - 1174
  • [49] Patient-reported outcomes of femoral osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective case series study
    Kubo, Yusuke
    Yamamoto, Takuaki
    Motomura, Goro
    Karasuyama, Kazuyuki
    Sonoda, Kazuhiko
    Iwamoto, Yukihide
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [50] Femoral Impaction Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Follow-Up of 540 Hips
    Lamberton, Tony D.
    Kenny, Paddy J.
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Timperley, A. John
    Gie, Graham A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08): : 1154 - 1160