Do Early Childhood Interventions Prevent Child Maltreatment? A Review of Research

被引:82
作者
Reynolds, Arthur J. [1 ,2 ]
Mathieson, Lindsay C. [3 ]
Topitzes, James W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Inst Child Dev, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Chicago Longitudinal Study, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dev Psychopathol & Clin Sci Program, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Social Work, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
child maltreatment; prevention; early childhood; HOME VISITING PROGRAM; FOLLOW-UP; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ABUSE; NEGLECT; VISITATION; ATTACHMENT; FAMILIES; WELFARE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1177/1077559508326223
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
We reviewed the empirical evidence on whether early childhood primary prevention programs can reduce rates of child abuse and neglect. Fifteen studies of 14 programs for children ages birth to 5 years were completed from 1990 to 2007 and assessed impacts with methodological rigor. All but one of the programs intervened from birth to age 3 through home visits, parent education classes, or the provision of health services. The weighted average effect size of program participation was a 2.9 percentage-point reduction in maltreatment (6.6% vs. 9.5%), which is equivalent to a 31% reduction in the rate of maltreatment and a fifth of a standard deviation. Of the five programs showing significant reductions in substantiated rates of child maltreatment, three provide strong evidence of preventive effects. Only the Child-Parent Centers (CPCs) and the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) assessed longer term preventive effects. Common elements of these effective programs included implementation by professional staff, relatively high dosage and intensity, and comprehensiveness of scope. The major conclusion is that the evidence base for programs in early childhood to prevent child maltreatment remains relatively weak. To advance the field, more longer term studies of a variety of intervention models are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 206
页数:25
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DEV PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 04073901 WASH STAT I
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U WISCONSIN M
[4]  
[Anonymous], TWIG BENT LAST EFF P
[5]   Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood [J].
Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ ;
van IJzendoorn, MH ;
Juffer, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (02) :195-215
[6]   Prevention: A report of progress and momentum into the future [J].
Barrera, Manuel, Jr. ;
Sandler, Irwin N. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2006, 13 (03) :221-226
[7]   AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF IN-HOME CHILD-ABUSE PREVENTION SERVICES [J].
BARTH, RP .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1991, 15 (04) :363-375
[8]  
Bickman L, 1990, Advances in program theory: New directions for evaluation, V47
[9]   The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violence - A systematic review [J].
Bilukha, O ;
Hahn, RA ;
Crosby, A ;
Fullilove, MT ;
Liberman, A ;
Moscicki, E ;
Snyder, S ;
Tuma, F ;
Corso, P ;
Schofield, A ;
Briss, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 28 (02) :11-39
[10]  
Bolger K., 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, P156, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.009, 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.009]