Bioenergy and land use change-state of the art

被引:52
作者
Berndes, Goran [1 ]
Ahlgren, Serina [2 ]
Borjesson, Pal [1 ]
Cowie, Annette L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm & Energy Dept, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Technol & Soc, Lund, Sweden
[3] Univ New England, Rural Climate Solut, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOFUELS TESTING PREDICTIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; ENERGY WOOD PRODUCTION; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; TRADE-OFFS; STOVER REMOVAL; FOOD SECURITY; NORWAY SPRUCE;
D O I
10.1002/wene.41
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Bioenergy projects can lead to direct and indirect land use change (LUC), which can substantially affect greenhouse gas balances with both beneficial and adverse outcomes for bioenergy's contribution to climate change mitigation. The causes behind LUC are multiple, complex, interlinked, and change over time. This makes quantification uncertain and sensitive to many factors that can develop in different directions-including land use productivity, trade patterns, prices and elasticities, and use of by-products associated with biofuels production. Quantifications reported so far vary substantially and do not support the ranking of bioenergy options with regard to LUC and associated emissions. There are however several options for mitigating these emissions, which can be implemented despite the uncertainties. Long-rotation forest management is associated with carbon emissions and sequestration that are not in temporal balance with each other and this leads to mitigation trade-offs between biomass extraction for energy use and the alternative to leave the biomass in the forest. Bioenergy's contribution to climate change mitigation needs to reflect a balance between near-term targets and the long-term objective to hold the increase in global temperature below 2 degrees C (Copenhagen Accord). Although emissions from LUC can be significant in some circumstances, the reality of such emissions is not sufficient reason to exclude bioenergy from the list of worthwhile technologies for climate changemitigation. Policy measures to minimize the negative impacts of LUC should be based on a holistic perspective recognizing the multiple drivers and effects of LUC. (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 303
页数:22
相关论文
共 157 条
[61]  
Greenpeace, 2011, FUELL BIOM WHY BURN
[62]   Project-based greenhouse-gas accounting: guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality [J].
Gustavsson, L ;
Karjalainen, T ;
Marland, G ;
Savolainen, I ;
Schlamadinger, B ;
Apps, M .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (13) :935-946
[63]   Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems [J].
Haberl, Helmut ;
Erb, K. Heinz ;
Krausmann, Fridolin ;
Gaube, Veronika ;
Bondeau, Alberte ;
Plutzar, Christoph ;
Gingrich, Simone ;
Lucht, Wolfgang ;
Fischer-Kowalski, Marina .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (31) :12942-12945
[64]   Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses [J].
Hertel, Thomas W. ;
Golub, Alla A. ;
Jones, Andrew D. ;
O'Hare, Michael ;
Plevin, Richard J. ;
Kammen, Daniel M. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 60 (03) :223-231
[65]  
Houghton R.A., 2008, TRENDS: A Compendium of Data on Global Change
[66]   The underpinnings of land-use history: three centuries of global gridded land-use transitions, wood-harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands [J].
Hurtt, G. C. ;
Frolking, S. ;
Fearon, M. G. ;
Moore, B. ;
Shevliakova, E. ;
Malyshev, S. ;
Pacala, S. W. ;
Houghton, R. A. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2006, 12 (07) :1208-1229
[67]   THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL SCARIFICATION ON THE TURN-OVER RATE OF SLASH NEEDLES AND NUTRIENT RELEASE [J].
JOHANSSON, MB .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1994, 9 (02) :170-179
[68]   Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective [J].
Jordaan, Sarah M. ;
Keith, David W. ;
Stelfox, Brad .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 4 (02)
[69]  
Keeney R., 2008, YIELD RESPONSE PRICE
[70]   The Indirect Land Use Impacts of United States Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses [J].
Keeney, Roman ;
Hertel, Thomas W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (04) :895-909