The Impact of Conflicts of Interest in Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of Acellular Dermal Matrix, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

被引:48
|
作者
Lopez, Joseph
Prifogle, Erin
Nyame, Theodore T.
Milton, Jacqueline
May, James W., Jr.
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH; ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY; ASSOCIATION; COMPLICATIONS; MODEL; SPONSORSHIP; PHYSICIANS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000172
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although conflicts of interest in biomedical research have received significant attention, the impact of conflicts of interest on surgical outcomes has not been fully explored. Methods: A systematic electronic search of the literature was performed for studies that evaluated surgical outcomes in acellular dermal matrix and non acellular dermal matrix implant-based breast reconstruction. Surgical complications, including infection, seroma, hematoma, necrosis, and explantation, were used as outcome metrics and extracted from studies. Surgical outcomes were then pooled and compared between studies that disclosed conflicts of interest and those that did not disclose conflicts of interest. Results: A total of 776 abstracts were identified, of which only 35 fulfilled the authors' inclusion criteria. Conflicts of interest were reported in 14 of these abstracts (40 percent). The pooled data from studies that reported no conflicts of interest and studies that reported conflicts of interest included a total of 8241 and 5384 breasts and 2852 and 1864 patients, respectively. Considered collectively, surgical complications were less common in studies that reported a conflict of interest than in studies that reported no conflicts of interest. When surgical outcome data were further stratified by acellular dermal matrix use, surgical complications were less common in studies with conflicts of interest when acellular dermal matrix was used. However, when acellular dermal matrix was not used, surgical complications were similar between authors that reported a conflict of interest and those that did not report a conflict of interest. Conclusions: Self-reported conflicts of interest are common in implant-based breast reconstruction research. Studies authored by groups with conflicts of interest are significantly associated with reporting lower surgical complications and therefore describing positive research findings, especially when industry-marketed products are being used in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:1328 / 1334
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre
    Barber, M. D.
    Williams, L.
    Anderson, E. D. C.
    Neades, G. T.
    Raine, C.
    Young, O.
    Kulkarni, D.
    Young, I.
    Dixon, J. M.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (01): : 100 - 105
  • [22] Outcome Assessment According to the Thickness and Direction of the Acellular Dermal Matrix after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Hur, Joon
    Han, Hyun Ho
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [23] Further Evidence that Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Decreases Inflammatory Markers of Capsule Formation in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Leong, Mimi
    Basu, C. Bob
    Hicks, M. John
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (01) : 40 - 47
  • [24] Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases
    Parikh, Rajiv P.
    Brown, Gabriella M.
    Sharma, Ketan
    Yan, Yan
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (06) : 1401 - 1409
  • [25] A 3D Mammometric Comparison of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)
    Tsay, Cynthia
    Zhu, Victor
    Sturrock, Tracy
    Shah, Ajul
    Kwei, Stephanie
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 42 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [26] Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): A comparative study
    Potter, S.
    Chambers, A.
    Govindajulu, S.
    Sahu, A.
    Warr, R.
    Cawthorn, S.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (01): : 113 - 119
  • [27] Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices
    Qureshi, Ali A.
    Broderick, Kristen P.
    Belz, Jessica
    Funk, Susan
    Reaven, Nancy
    Brandt, Keith E.
    Tenenbaum, Marissa M.
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    Aft, Rebecca L.
    Myckatyn, Terence M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (02) : 173E - 183E
  • [28] The Impact of Conflict of Interest in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix
    DeGeorge, Brent R., Jr.
    Holland, Michael C.
    Drake, David B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2015, 74 (02) : 242 - 247
  • [29] Outcomes of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with Braxon® acellular dermal matrix-a single-centre experience
    Chandarana, Mihir
    Soumian, Soni
    Jafferbhoy, Sadaf
    Marla, Sekhar
    Narayanan, Sankaran
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 42 (05) : 431 - 438
  • [30] A Long-term Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Risk-reducing Mastectomy
    Khan, Nida
    Wickman, Marie
    Schultz, Inkeri
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (07)