Developmental differences in effects of task pacing on implicit sequence learning

被引:15
|
作者
Hodel, Amanda S. [1 ]
Markant, Julie C. [2 ]
Van Den Heuvell, Sara E. [1 ]
Cirilli-Raether, Jenie M. [1 ]
Thomas, Kathleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Inst Child Dev, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit Linguist & Psychol Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 5卷
关键词
implicit sequence learning; serial reaction time paradigm; statistical learning; probabilistic learning; developmental invariance hypothesis; CHILDREN; AGE; REWARD; ADULTS; TIME; ADOLESCENCE; INFANCY; CHOICE; MEMORY; FMRI;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00153
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although there is now substantial evidence that developmental change occurs in implicit learning abilities over the lifespan, disparate results exist regarding the specific developmental trajectory of implicit learning skills. One possible reason for discrepancies across implicit learning studies may be that younger children show an increased sensitivity to variations in implicit learning task procedures and demands relative to adults. Studies using serial-reaction time (SRT) tasks have suggested that in adults, measurements of implicit learning are robust across variations in task procedures. Most classic SRT tasks have used response-contingent pacing in which the participant's own reaction time determines the duration of each trial. However, recent paradigms with adults and children have used fixed trial pacing, which leads to alterations in both response and attention demands, accuracy feedback, perceived agency, and task motivation for participants. In the current study, we compared learning on fixed-paced and self-paced versions of a spatial sequence learning paradigm in 4-year-old children and adults. Results indicated that preschool-aged children showed reduced evidence of implicit sequence learning in comparison to adults, regardless of the SRT paradigm used. In addition, we found the preschoolers showed significantly greater learning when stimulus presentation was self-paced. These data provide evidence for developmental differences in implicit sequence learning that are dependent on specific task demands such as stimulus pacing, which may be related to developmental changes in the impact of broader constructs such as attention and task motivation on implicit learning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of a secondary task on "implicit" sequence learning: learning or performance?
    David R. Shanks
    Shelley Channon
    Psychological Research, 2002, 66 : 99 - 109
  • [2] Effects of a secondary task on "implicit" sequence learning: learning or performance?
    Shanks, DR
    Channon, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2002, 66 (02): : 99 - 109
  • [3] Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning
    Stark-Inbar, Alit
    Raza, Meher
    Taylor, Jordan A.
    Ivry, Richard B.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 117 (01) : 412 - 428
  • [4] Implicit sequence learning in a search task
    Jimenez, Luis
    Vazquez, Gustavo A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 61 (11): : 1650 - 1657
  • [5] Evidence of developmental differences in implicit sequence learning: An fMRI study of children and adults
    Thomas, KM
    Hunt, RH
    Vizueta, N
    Sommer, T
    Durston, S
    Yang, YH
    Worden, MS
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (08) : 1339 - 1351
  • [6] No effects of transcranial DLPFC stimulation on implicit task sequence learning and consolidation
    Savic, Branislav
    Cazzoli, Dario
    Muri, Rene
    Meier, Beat
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [7] No effects of transcranial DLPFC stimulation on implicit task sequence learning and consolidation
    Branislav Savic
    Dario Cazzoli
    René Müri
    Beat Meier
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [8] A developmental neuroimaging study of implicit sequence learning
    Thomas, K
    Vizueta, N
    Teylan, M
    Sommer, T
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 99 - 99
  • [9] Implicit task sequence learning with auditory stimuli
    Weiermann, Brigitte
    Meier, Beat
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 24 (04) : 468 - 475
  • [10] Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context
    Vaidya, Chandan J.
    Huger, Marianne
    Howard, Darlene V.
    Howard, James H., Jr.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 497 - 506