Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction at 37 Weeks: A Comparison of Doppler and Placental Pathology

被引:6
作者
Curtin, William M. [1 ]
Millington, Karmaine A. [2 ]
Ibekwe, Tochi O. [3 ]
Ural, Serdar H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Pathol & Lab Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Hershey, PA USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hershey, PA USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Radiol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
UMBILICAL ARTERY DOPPLER; REFERENCE RANGES; PULSATILITY INDEX; OUTCOMES; WEIGHT; SIGNS; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNDERPERFUSION; POPULATION; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1155/2017/3723879
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective. Our objective was determining if abnormal Doppler evaluation had a higher prevalence of placental pathology compared to normal Doppler in suspected fetal growth restriction (FGR) of cases delivered at 37 weeks. Study Design. This retrospective cohort study of suspected FGR singletons with antenatal Doppler evaluation delivered at 37 weeks had a primary outcome of the prevalence of placental pathology related to FGR. Significance was defined as p <= 0.05. Results. Of 100 pregnancies 46 and 54 were in the abnormal and normal Doppler cohorts, respectively. Placental pathology was more prevalent with any abnormal Doppler, 84.8% versus 55.6%, odds ratio (OR) 4.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.55, 13.22, and p = 0.002. Abnormal middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler had a higher prevalence: 96.2% versus 54.8%, OR 20.7, 95% CI: 2.54, 447.1, and p < 0.001. Conclusion. Abnormal Doppler was associated with more placental pathology in comparison to normal Doppler in fetuses with suspected FGR. Abnormal MCA Doppler had the strongest association.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy [J].
Acharya, G ;
Wilsgaard, T ;
Berntsen, GKR ;
Maltau, JM ;
Kiserud, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (03) :937-944
[2]   Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies [J].
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Stampalija, Tamara ;
Gyte, Gillian M. L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01)
[3]  
ALTSHULER G, 1984, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V108, P71
[4]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, ACOG PRACTICE B, V101
[5]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2013, ACOG PRACTICE B, V134
[6]  
Anderson M., 1999, Neonatalogy Pathophysiology and Management of the newborn, V5th, P411
[7]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[8]   Differentiation of growth retarded from normally grown fetuses and prediction of intrauterine growth retardation using Doppler ultrasound [J].
Bates, JA ;
Evans, JA ;
Mason, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :670-675
[9]   Outcomes of post-term births: The role of fetal growth restriction and malformations [J].
Clausson, B ;
Cnattingius, S ;
Axelsson, O .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (05) :758-762
[10]   Umbilical Artery Doppler Indices in Small for Gestational Age Fetuses Correlation With Adverse Outcomes and Placental Abnormalities [J].
Dicke, Jeffrey M. ;
Huettner, Phyllis ;
Yan, Sida ;
Odibo, Anthony ;
Kraus, Frederick T. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (12) :1603-1610