Long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in 180 adults in the era of endourologic procedures

被引:27
作者
Gögüs, Ç [1 ]
Karamürsel, T [1 ]
Tokatli, Z [1 ]
Yaman, Ö [1 ]
Özdiler, E [1 ]
Gögüs, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
ureteropelvic junction obstruction; open pyeloplasty; long-term results;
D O I
10.1159/000078796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term results of adult open pyeloplasties performed by the Anderson-Hynes technique in the era of new endourologic procedures. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 180 adult patients who underwent Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty with a diagnosis of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postoperative results were compared with clinical, radiologic and radionuclide studies. The mean age of the patients was 33.2 (16-65) years. The minimum clinical follow-up time was 12 months and the mean time from the operation was 9.4 years (between 1 and 17 years). Results: Success was defined as resolution of symptoms and decrease in pyelocaliceal volume and calicectasis. The overall success rate was 91.1%. The success rate was between 93.1 and 100% in patients with grades I-III and 62.5% in patients with grade IV hydronephrosis and contribute to renal function less than 25%. The pyelocaliceal volume returned to normal in 39 (21.7%) patients, significantly decreased in 82 (45.5%), and the flow of contrast media from renal pelvis to ureter improved in 43 (23.9%) and did not change or increased in 16 (8.9%). The failure happened in the first 3 months in 57% of patients and in long-term follow-up in 43% of patients. Conclusion: Despite newer endoscopic techniques, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty, with an over 90% success rate remains the gold standard in the treatment of primary UPJ obstruction. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 14
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ANDERSON J C, 1949, Br J Urol, V21, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1949.tb10773.x
[2]   Is open pyeloplasty still justified? [J].
Arun, N ;
Kekre, NS ;
Nath, V ;
Gopalakrishnan, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03) :379-381
[3]   Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Moore, RG ;
Chen, RN ;
Iverson, AJ ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :692-695
[4]   RENAL-FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH HYDRONEPHROSIS [J].
BRATT, CG ;
AURELL, M ;
NILSSON, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1977, 49 (04) :249-255
[5]   COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ENDOUROLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE OBSTRUCTED URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION [J].
BROOKS, JD ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
PREMINGER, GM ;
SCHUESSLER, WW ;
MOORE, RG .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (06) :791-795
[6]   Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy at a single setting [J].
Conlin, MJ ;
Bagley, DH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :727-731
[7]  
Danuser H, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64011-4
[8]   Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J].
Gerber, GS ;
Kim, JC .
UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (02) :198-202
[9]   Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty: The long-term results [J].
Jabbour, ME ;
Goldfischer, ER ;
Klima, WJ ;
Stravodimos, KG ;
Smith, AD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (03) :690-692
[10]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases [J].
Jarrett, TW ;
Chan, DY ;
Charambura, TC ;
Fugita, O ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1253-1256