Multi-center analytical evaluation of a novel automated tacrolimus immunoassay

被引:41
作者
Shipkova, Maria [1 ]
Vogeser, Michael [2 ]
Alia Ramos, Pedro [3 ]
Verstraete, Alain G. [4 ,5 ]
Orth, Matthias [6 ]
Schneider, Christian [7 ]
Wallemacq, Pierre [8 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Hosp Univ Munich, Inst Lab Med, Munich, Germany
[3] Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[5] Ghent Univ Hosp, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Marien Hosp, Stuttgart, Germany
[7] Roche Diagnost GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
[8] Catholic Univ Louvain, Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Tacrolimus; Immunoassay; Therapeutic drug monitoring; ECLIA; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION; STANDARDIZATION; PROTOCOL; THERAPY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.03.023
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Tacrolimus (TAC) is a post-transplantation immunosuppressant drug used in patients for whom careful monitoring of TAC concentration is essential. A new semi-automated immunoassay for TAC measurement, the Elecsys Tacrolimus assay, is available and has been assessed in a multi-center evaluation. Methods: Residual whole blood samples from patients undergoing TAC therapy after organ transplant were used in assay evaluation at five clinical laboratories in Europe. Experiments included imprecision according to CLSI EP5-A2 (within-run and intermediate), functional sensitivity, linearity according to CLSI EP6-A, and recovery from external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) samples. The assay was compared to LC-MS/MS used routinely at each investigational site, and to the Abbott Architect immunoassay. Results: Linearity from 0.5 to 40 mu g/L was observed and functional sensitivity of 0.3 mu g/L (CV <= 20%) was determined. Within-run imprecision was <= 5.1% on cobas e 602 (5.1% at 1.5 mu g/L) and <= 8.9% (8.9% at 0.8 mu g/L) on cobas e 411. The intermediate imprecision for TAC concentrations >= 6.8 mu g/L was <= 6.5%. At lower therapeutic concentrations (to 1.5 mu g/L) it was consistently <= 10%. Deming regression analysis of method comparison to LC-MS/MS yielded slopes of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.05/1.10) for heart transplant samples, 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09/1.16) for kidney, and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02/1.08) for lung transplant samples. Conclusions: The Elecsys Tacrolimus assay has good linearity, functional sensitivity and intermediate imprecision and is comparable to LC-MS/MS methods. The over-all performance of ECLIA demonstrates a modern generation TAC assay that meets the demands of monitoring drug concentrations in current immunosuppressive regimens. (C) 2014 The Authors. The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1077
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Evaluation of 2 Immunoassays for Monitoring Low Blood Levels of Tacrolimus [J].
Amann, Shawn ;
Parker, Thomas S. ;
Levine, Daniel M. .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2009, 31 (02) :273-276
[2]   Standardization of LC-MS for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tacrolimus [J].
Annesley, Thomas M. ;
McKeown, Denise A. ;
Holt, David W. ;
Mussell, Christopher ;
Champarnaud, Elodie ;
Harter, Leonie ;
Calton, Lisa J. ;
Mason, Donald S. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (11) :1630-1637
[3]   Simple extraction protocol for analysis of immunosuppressant drugs in whole blood [J].
Annesley, TM ;
Clayton, L .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (10) :1845-1848
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TACR EL R 2010 MOD A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, TACR ARCH R
[6]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[7]   Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry or Automated Immunoassays: What Are the Future Trends in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? [J].
Brandhorst, Gunnar ;
Oellerich, Michael ;
Maine, Gregory ;
Taylor, Paul ;
Veen, Gerhard ;
Wallemacq, Pierre .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 58 (05) :821-825
[8]   New-onset diabetes after transplantation-should it be a factor in choosing an immunosuppressant regimen for kidney transplant recipients [J].
Chadban, Steven .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (06) :1816-1818
[9]  
CLSI, 2003, EV LIN QUANT MEAS PR
[10]  
CLSI, 2004, EV PREC PERF QUANT M