Tracking Progress in Peer-Delivered Family-to-Family Support

被引:8
作者
Anthony, Bruno J. [1 ,2 ]
Serkin, Celia [3 ]
Kahn, Nicole [2 ,7 ]
Troxel, Mary [4 ,5 ]
Shank, Jane [6 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Pediat & Psychiat, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Child & Human Dev, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Montgomery Cty Federat Families Childrens Mental, Silver Spring, MD USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Pediat Mental Hlth Inst, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Michigan Assoc Childrens Mental Hlth, Lansing, MI USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
family-to-family support; caregivers; children's mental health; outcomes; CHILDRENS MENTAL-HEALTH; CONTENT VALIDITY; EDUCATION; SERVICES; STRAIN; CARE;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000256
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Peer delivered, family-to-family (F2F) support-defined as the provision of outreach, engagement, knowledge, care coordination, and support to family members of children and youth with mental health challenges-is a rapidly growing and needed component of the service array. Progress is occurring toward greater specification of program models and core competencies for the parent support providers (PSPs) with lived experience providing these services; however, strategies to inform quality improvement and ensure accountability are lacking. The Family Journey Assessment (FJA), completed by PSPs and family members, fills this gap by tracking caregiver progress toward self-advocacy and self-efficacy. Analyses of 436 FJAs showed a reliable 3-component structure, reflecting progress in the recognition of needs, collaboration to access help from formal and natural supports, and activation of skills to cope with stress, enhance resilience, and develop and carry out plans of care. PSP feedback provided strong evidence for relevance and usability. Examination of FJAs at baseline and follow-up provides one of the first reports showing significant improvement in key indicators of benefit of F2F for participating families. The FJA holds promise as a measure of the impact of F2F services on key goals and as a way to identify benchmarks for focused and individualized peer-to-peer support depending on the family's level of need.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 401
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Factors Contributing to Reduced Caregiver Strain in a Publicly Funded Child Mental Health System
    Accurso, Erin C.
    Garland, Ann F.
    Haine-Schlagel, Rachel
    Brookman-Frazee, Lauren
    Baker-Ericzen, Mary J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2015, 23 (03) : 131 - 143
  • [2] Perceived parental burden and service use for child and adolescent psychiatric disorders
    Angold, A
    Messer, SC
    Stangl, D
    FArmer, EMZ
    Costello, EJ
    Burns, BJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [3] Anthony H, 2012, BIOFUTUR, P20
  • [4] Who gets hospitalized in a continuum of care?
    Bickman, L
    Foster, EM
    Lambert, EW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 35 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [5] Health Care Workforce Development to Enhance Mental and Behavioral Health of Children and Youths
    Boat, Thomas F.
    Land, Marshall L., Jr.
    Leslie, Laurel K.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2017, 171 (11) : 1031 - 1032
  • [6] Parental strain, mental health problems, and parenting practices: A longitudinal study
    Borre, Alicia
    Kliewer, Wendy
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 68 : 93 - 97
  • [7] The role of caregiver strain and other family variables in determining children's use of mental health services
    Brannan, AM
    Heflinger, CA
    Foster, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2003, 11 (02) : 77 - 91
  • [8] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2013, CLAR GUID PEER SUPP
  • [9] Cook JA, 2004, J BEHAV HEALTH SER R, V31, P384
  • [10] Who talks?: The social psychology of illness support groups
    Davison, KP
    Pennebaker, JW
    Dickerson, SS
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (02) : 205 - 217